Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-30 Thread Frank Lauterwald

Hi Jeff,

thanks for the feedback
> I just downloaded lic2-0.55 and began testing.  There's still
> one problem:  it doesn't undo if you work on an image in place.
fixed 

I also added non-interactive mode which makes animations possible (this looks 
like everything is flowing in the vectorfield-direction). A small fu-script 
for demonstration is included (but has to be copied to the appropriate 
directory by hand).

I'm kind of confused: I got mailed quite some cool ideas for 
improvements/more features but no _real_ bug reports (counting "undo" as 
feature ;-) ). Has nobody managed to crash the plugin yet? ;-)

Frank


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-30 Thread Jeff Trefftzs

Hi Frank -

I just downloaded lic2-0.55 and began testing.  There's still 
one problem:  it doesn't undo if you work on an image in place.  
But you'll be pleased to know that the Makefile works out of the 
box on my system (RH 6.1, mostly).  Still, it's a great 
improvement over 0.50.

Keep up the good work!


-- 
--Jeff

Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.tcsn.net/trefftzsHome Page
http://gug.sunsite.dk/gallery.php?artist=68 Gimp Gallery
http://trefftzs.topcities.com/home.html Photo galleries



___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov

LDFLAGS = -L$(XLIBS)
must beLIBS

Oleg

On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Frank Lauterwald wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've rewritten the old "Van Gogh(LIC)"-plugin which has been unmaintained for
> a few years.
> Main features are a wider range of options as well as increased speed (up to
> factor 15). It is registered (Gimp-plugin-registry) under the name "lic2"
> It can be found at http://www.uni-erlangen.de/~sifrlaut
> I would be happy if someone could test it.
>
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to write Makefile.am and stuff properly to be able
> to just copy the source into a Gimp-source-tree so that a toplevel-make will
> compile it.
> Thus compiling it may require to manually change some paths in the Makefile
> (which isn't too sophisticated anyway). Sorry 'bout that.
>
>
> This is the first time I release a bit of code - so if anything is wrong:
> don't flame - help a newbie ;-)
>
> regards
>
> Frank
> ___
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
>

Regards,
Oleg
_
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-27 Thread Frank Lauterwald

On Sunday 27 January 2002 12:29, you wrote:
>
> I haven't looked at it yet but we are always happy to see an unmaintained
> plug-in being taken over and taking care of. IMO we should replace the
> lic plug-in in the 1.3 development tree with your version. What do you
> think?
I'd be quite happy about that but I just learned that the new plugin will 
require a bit more testing before it is ready for it (just fixed a few bugs, 
one of which made the plugin almost unusable - thanks to David Hodson for the 
hint and some nice ideas)

Frank
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-27 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

Frank Lauterwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've rewritten the old "Van Gogh(LIC)"-plugin which has been unmaintained for 
> a few years.
> Main features are a wider range of options as well as increased speed (up to 
> factor 15). It is registered (Gimp-plugin-registry) under the name "lic2"
> It can be found at http://www.uni-erlangen.de/~sifrlaut
> I would be happy if someone could test it.

I haven't looked at it yet but we are always happy to see an unmaintained
plug-in being taken over and taking care of. IMO we should replace the
lic plug-in in the 1.3 development tree with your version. What do you
think?


Salut, Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-26 Thread Jim Meier

On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 18:02, Frank Lauterwald wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've rewritten the old "Van Gogh(LIC)"-plugin which has been unmaintained for 
> a few years.
> Main features are a wider range of options as well as increased speed (up to 
> factor 15). It is registered (Gimp-plugin-registry) under the name "lic2"
> It can be found at http://www.uni-erlangen.de/~sifrlaut
> I would be happy if someone could test it.
> 


Wow. I haven't tried the plugin myself yet (get to that in a few
moments) but .. beautiful. Your gallery is stunning. You and your
photographer should be very, very proud.

Thanks for sharing this :)

-Jim

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



[Gimp-developer] plugin-announcement

2002-01-26 Thread Frank Lauterwald

Hi,

I've rewritten the old "Van Gogh(LIC)"-plugin which has been unmaintained for 
a few years.
Main features are a wider range of options as well as increased speed (up to 
factor 15). It is registered (Gimp-plugin-registry) under the name "lic2"
It can be found at http://www.uni-erlangen.de/~sifrlaut
I would be happy if someone could test it.

I'm afraid I wasn't able to write Makefile.am and stuff properly to be able 
to just copy the source into a Gimp-source-tree so that a toplevel-make will 
compile it.
Thus compiling it may require to manually change some paths in the Makefile 
(which isn't too sophisticated anyway). Sorry 'bout that.


This is the first time I release a bit of code - so if anything is wrong: 
don't flame - help a newbie ;-)

regards

Frank
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer