Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.13
Sven Neumann wrote: > automake-1.4 is too old. We require at least automake-1.6 and prefer > 1.7 even. The file HACKING clearly states this requirement. Upgraded to latest automake. Configure gets further but still fails: ./configure: line 12377: syntax error near unexpected token `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GMODULE,' ./configure: line 12377: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GMODULE, gmodule-2.0)' > if you do. Perhaps we should nevertheless distribute it? It probably wouldn't hurt. I wouldn't be running the auto tools, but the EXIF patch changes the gimp-1.3.13/configure.in, and the gimp-1.3.13/plug-ins/common/Makefile.am files. So the auto tools need to be run afterward. I don't expect you guys to support what I'm doing; I'm just curious as to why it's not working in 1.3.13. That's all. :-) Thanks. jas -- Jason Van Patten AOL IM: Jason VP ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.13
Hi, Jason Van Patten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > are you sure that you run the correct version of aclocal? That would > > be the one that corresponds to the version of automake you > > used. > > Looks like they're the same (1.4) version. > > $ ls -la acloc* automake* > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 Feb 22 12:56 aclocal -> aclocal-1.4* > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root11286 Feb 28 2002 aclocal-1.4* > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root13161 Apr 3 2002 aclocal-1.5* > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 Feb 22 12:56 automake -> automake-1.4* > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 199823 Feb 28 2002 automake-1.4* > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 216008 Apr 3 2002 automake-1.5* automake-1.4 is too old. We require at least automake-1.6 and prefer 1.7 even. The file HACKING clearly states this requirement. > > Basically you shouldn't run the various auto tools by hand but > > use autogen.sh. > > Where's that usually live? it's a script that is in the CVS tree. It is not part of the GIMP tarball since you shouldn't have to fiddle with the auto tools as a user who builds from tarball and it is likely that you mess things up if you do. Perhaps we should nevertheless distribute it? Salut, Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.13
Sven Neumann wrote: are you sure that you run the correct version of aclocal? That would be the one that corresponds to the version of automake you used. Looks like they're the same (1.4) version. $ ls -la acloc* automake* lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 Feb 22 12:56 aclocal -> aclocal-1.4* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root11286 Feb 28 2002 aclocal-1.4* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root13161 Apr 3 2002 aclocal-1.5* lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 Feb 22 12:56 automake -> automake-1.4* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 199823 Feb 28 2002 automake-1.4* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 216008 Apr 3 2002 automake-1.5* Basically you shouldn't run the various auto tools by hand but use autogen.sh. Where's that usually live? jas -- Jason Van Patten AOL IM: Jason VP ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.13
Hi, Jason Van Patten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm having a bit of trouble with the 1.3.13 tree. I tried applying > the libexif patch that I posted a week or two ago, then ran the > various "auto" commands to regen the config files, header files, and > makefiles. Automake complained: > > # automake > aclocal.m4: 1066: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER' > aclocal.m4: 1105: `jm_MAINTAINER_MODE' is obsolete; use `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE' > aclocal.m4: 4865: `fp_PROG_CC_STDC' is obsolete; use `AM_PROG_CC_STDC' are you sure that you run the correct version of aclocal? That would be the one that corresponds to the version of automake you used. Basically you shouldn't run the various auto tools by hand but use autogen.sh. > What am I doing wrong? I didn't have this issue with the 1.3.12 tree, > with or without the patch applied. I don't think we changed something in the build system between 1.3.12 and 1.3.13 so I suspect that you are doing something different this time (or changed your build setup). Salut, Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.13
Sven - Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, there is a new GIMP development release available from: ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.3/v1.3.13/ I'm having a bit of trouble with the 1.3.13 tree. I tried applying the libexif patch that I posted a week or two ago, then ran the various "auto" commands to regen the config files, header files, and makefiles. Automake complained: # automake aclocal.m4: 1066: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER' aclocal.m4: 1105: `jm_MAINTAINER_MODE' is obsolete; use `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE' aclocal.m4: 4865: `fp_PROG_CC_STDC' is obsolete; use `AM_PROG_CC_STDC' plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:354: variable `LIBBZ2' not defined plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:946: variable `LIBMAIL' not defined plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:1289: variable `LIBSCREENSHOT' not defined plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:1551: variable `LIBURL' not defined plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:1632: variable `LIBWINCLIPBOARD' not defined plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:1657: variable `LIBWINPRINT' not defined plug-ins/common/Makefile.am:7: invalid unused variable name: `AM_LDFLAGS' plug-ins/flame/Makefile.am:24: variable `LIBUCB' not defined plug-ins/flame/Makefile.am:24: variable `LIBUCB' not defined configure.in: 1066: required file `./$@)].in' not found Configure ran fine. However, trying to run make got me: # make -j3 /bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `)]' /bin/sh: -c: line 1: `if test ! -f )].in; then rm -f ./stamp-h2.in; make ./stamp-h2.in; else :; fi' make: *** [)].in] Error 2 I backed out, deleted the directory, and started again. This time, I *didn't* apply the patch but used the raw files from the tarball. For giggles, I ran the same series of "auto" commands, and got the same errors. Including the error with make. Somehow, this gets planted in the Makefile: )]: stamp-h2 @if test ! -f $@; then \ rm -f stamp-h2; \ $(MAKE) stamp-h2; \ else :; fi I don't think /bin/sh likes that too much. What am I doing wrong? I didn't have this issue with the 1.3.12 tree, with or without the patch applied. Thanks! jas -- Jason Van Patten AOL IM: Jason VP ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
