Re: [Gimp-developer] Patches to 1.2.1 for --with-included-gettext and HP-UX 11.00

2001-03-06 Thread egger
On 6 Mar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> PS: IMHO we should change the policy for patches. Handling them via >> FTP has never worked that well. Patches should go to the list >> (preferably with the word [patch] in the subject) or/and to bugzilla. > Why not use SourceForge to manage patches? B

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patches to 1.2.1 for --with-included-gettext and HP-UX 11.00

2001-03-06 Thread gimp-devel
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:29:26PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I submitted patches to resolve the following for 1.2.0 but they were > > not included in 1.2.1. Any chance of them getting merged in? > > Are you sure you submitted them? I have never received an emai

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patches to 1.2.1 for --with-included-gettext and HP-UX 11.00

2001-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I submitted patches to resolve the following for 1.2.0 but they were > not included in 1.2.1. Any chance of them getting merged in? Are you sure you submitted them? I have never received an email that you did (I get the ftp-admin mails and you are supposed to sen