Re: [Gimp-developer] nightly builds of the manual (buildbot)
On 12/08/2010 01:08 AM, Marco Ciampa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: >> It seems a bit too risky to push every build to wilber, at least in the >> beginning. > > Where exactly do you see a danger? That the buildbot will publish broken or corrupt builds. For example, we need to deal with that the internet connection breaks while in the middle of uploading a new documentation build. It is all solvable of course, but let's first make the buildbot do perfect local builds of the manual. When it has done that for a few weeks or so, we can make it publish the builds too. / Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Nightly GIMP, GEGL, babl tarball builds" ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] nightly builds of the manual (buildbot)
Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: > On 12/07/2010 03:39 AM, Roman Joost wrote: > It seems a bit too risky to push every build to wilber, at least in the > beginning. That's fine. Perhaps I could ask my employer to sponsor a bit of server space and run another buildbot which updates the HTML documents on wilber by an scp. > Assuming we don't do that for now, is the important thing for you just > to see if the build completes without errors? Absolutely. > Just double-checking. If that is the case, I'll set up a buildbot > doing the steps above. I can't promise to do it immediately though. Take your time! Thanks a lot for this! -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanof...@gimp.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] nightly builds of the manual (buildbot)
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: > It seems a bit too risky to push every build to wilber, at least in the > beginning. Where exactly do you see a danger? -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] nightly builds of the manual (buildbot)
On 12/07/2010 03:39 AM, Roman Joost wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a positive reply to include a nightly build of the manual on > the GIMP buildbot a few weeks ago. > > In the mean time I created a snipped and tested it on my own machine: > > f1 = factory.BuildFactory() > > f1.addStep(buildbot.steps.source.Git(repourl="git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2", > mode="update")) > f1.addStep(ShellCommand(command=["./autogen.sh", "--without-gimp"])) > f1.addStep(ShellCommand(command=["make", "html"])) > > Note: This will occupy quite a bit of disk space. On my buildbot where > I tested the snippet it was occupying about 710 MB. > > Questions: > > * Is it possible to synchronise the build artifacts (the generated >HTML or other formats) with wilber? If so it would make sense to >add more steps. Hi It seems a bit too risky to push every build to wilber, at least in the beginning. Assuming we don't do that for now, is the important thing for you just to see if the build completes without errors? Just double-checking. If that is the case, I'll set up a buildbot doing the steps above. I can't promise to do it immediately though. Cheers, Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Nightly GIMP, GEGL, babl tarball builds" ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
