Re: [Gimp-developer] weekend 2.6 UI roadmap roundup...
Hi, On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 19:16 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote: I'd add the quality of downscaling as a high priority need. Currently it's possible to downscale images using 50% steps at a time (it was discussed before) but it would be better if one single scaling step produces the best quality possible (maybe automating the 50% steps, as it was discussed before). This is an important issue. But it has to be addressed in GEGL as we will soon start to use the GEGL scaling routines. Definitely an important task to put on the tasks list for GEGL. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] weekend 2.6 UI roadmap roundup...
I'd add the quality of downscaling as a high priority need. Currently it's possible to downscale images using 50% steps at a time (it was discussed before) but it would be better if one single scaling step produces the best quality possible (maybe automating the 50% steps, as it was discussed before). IIRC Sven informed that this issue would be easier to address with GEGL, so I don't know if proposing this fix before GEGL is appropriate. Anyway I'd like to point that it's a need for people who work with graphics for the web. Gez. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] weekend 2.6 UI roadmap roundup...
Actually I got the impression that it had changed, and now box-filtering was used, which does account for all input pixels. OTOH, Lanczos currently produces poor results. Geert Jordaans (sp?) was working on improving this. On 10/30/07, Guillermo Espertino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd add the quality of downscaling as a high priority need. Currently it's possible to downscale images using 50% steps at a time (it was discussed before) but it would be better if one single scaling step produces the best quality possible (maybe automating the 50% steps, as it was discussed before). IIRC Sven informed that this issue would be easier to address with GEGL, so I don't know if proposing this fix before GEGL is appropriate. Anyway I'd like to point that it's a need for people who work with graphics for the web. Gez. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
