On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> familiar with this code could help me a bit or add some documentation
> to the undo code, then I will attempt to fix gimp_undo_push_group_start.
I can understand this, but how about just _replacing_ these two pd
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> So... errr... I don't know what to do. Does anybody have strong
> preferences for one solution (several calls in each script) or the
> other (two PDB calls hiding the gory details)? Or a third one (fixing
> gimp_undo_push_group_s
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 12:13:56AM +0100, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How to make these scripts undo-aware? The problem is not really
>
> I'd say the obvious way would be to make gimp_undo_push_group_start just
> "w
Raphael Quinet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Olof and others mentioned here that it is important for the GIMP to
> have a consistent interface. One of the inconsistencies that should
> be fixed before 1.2 is the fact that many scripts (mostly Script-Fu)
> are not undoable. Making these scripts un
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 12:13:56AM +0100, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to make these scripts undo-aware? The problem is not really
I'd say the obvious way would be to make gimp_undo_push_group_start just
"work", rather than adding another kludge no user will ever understand.
Olof and others mentioned here that it is important for the GIMP to
have a consistent interface. One of the inconsistencies that should
be fixed before 1.2 is the fact that many scripts (mostly Script-Fu)
are not undoable. Making these scripts undo-aware is a prerequisite
for moving them from th
