Hi,
> I talked to Raster right after the first email arrived and he said he
> would take care of it. I was hoping to give him a running start before
> the ugly free software posse jumped him. I must say that this mailing list
> has degenerated into something akin to a Microsoft legal newsgroup. S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spontaneously blurts out:
>
> On 25 Jun, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> >> He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think
> >> about possible solutions for this conflict.
>
> > Don't they think this is demanding some _action_ (like reverting that
> > patch)? "mee
On 25 Jun, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>> He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think
>> about possible solutions for this conflict.
> Don't they think this is demanding some _action_ (like reverting that
> patch)? "meet next week" and "possible solutions" sounds, well, not
> ver
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 05:05:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think about
> possible solutions for this conflict.
Don't they think this is demanding some _action_ (like reverting that
patch)? "meet next week" and "possible soluti
