>
>Anyway, it seems nobody has the time and energy to really work on the
>needed changes in script-fu to make it a viable programming environment.
>
> > More generally is it possible for script-fu scripts to introduce memory
> > leaks even tough scheme in itself is a garbage collected language?
>
Hi,
> Secondly, I'm confused by the function gimp-file-save. Specifically why do
> I need to pass an image and a drawable? If I load an image, do some image
> level manipulations on it, and then want to save it with gimp-image-save,
> do I need to create a layer?
most save plug-ins can not
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > More generally is it possible for script-fu scripts to introduce memory
> > leaks even tough scheme in itself is a garbage collected language?
>
I think that if a script terminates unexpectedly it leaks all GIMP
resources that it created. If the res
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:06:10PM -0700, christopher baus wrote:
> Secondly, I'm confused by the function gimp-file-save. Specifically why do
> I need to pass an image and a drawable? If I load an image, do some image
> level manipulations on it, and then want to save it with gimp-image-save,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:06:10PM -0700, christopher baus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> something like perl, but that's IMHO. I know a lot of people aren't down
> with functional programming languages.
(... like perl ;)
Anyway, it seems nobody has the time and energy to really work on the
nee
