On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 10:23:16PM +0100, regis rampnoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> of warnings: I don't known if there are importants or not: (variable not used,
> not initialised, long instead int etc.)
warnings depend on the compiler. The right way for an "end-user" is to not
compile with wa
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 10:21:29PM +, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/X11/gtkbuffet/libs/gtkxmhtml/ contains
> just this -- a non-GNOME version of GtkXmHTML, which works fine with
> the help browser.
Maybe this should be marked prominent
> "Steinar" == Steinar H Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steinar> AGAIN (I sent this only a couple of days ago, but nobody
Steinar> seems to have listened):
Steinar> ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/X11/gtkbuffet/libs/gtkxmhtml/
Steinar> contains just this -- a non-GNOME
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 02:28:34PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>Thus an alternative would be to release a gtkxmhtml package and put
>it up on ftp.gimp.org.
AGAIN (I sent this only a couple of days ago, but nobody seems to
have listened):
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/X11/gtkbuffet/libs/gtkxmhtm
On 17-Dec-99 Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Guys, I strongly suggest that libgtkxmhtml *NOT* be used for
> the help browser.
I have some problems too:
1) configure don't work for xmhtmlk (see the diff result)
2) I have warningw when I launch the gimp
and one item in my wish list:
that the developpers c
[snip]
-> While we are at it.. clearly, creating a specs file for rpm or any other
-> package manager is not _our_ problem.
->
-> But we might think about doing it anyway: I already got complaints from
-> distribution-makers that our specs file (in the tarball) is utterly
-> outdated.
I have an
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 02:28:34PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For the problem of packaging The GIMP I´d suggest to create a seperate
> gimp-gnome package that contains the help-browser and the gimp.desktop file
While we are at it.. clearly, creating a specs file for rpm or
Hi,
> Guys, I strongly suggest that libgtkxmhtml *NOT* be used for
> the help browser.
>
Please, not again. Here´s what I think was the result of the latest thread on
this subject:
The helpbrowser will stay as it is (using GtkXmHtml) as long as there´s no
useable alternative. As soon as a bet
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 12:40:25PM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
>Is there any alternative? I've heard talk of a non-GNOME-based
>gtkxmhtml, but I don't know anything about it.
As noted on #gimp, try your local mirror of
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/X11/gtkbuffet/libs/gtkxmhtml/
A simple searc
Guys, I strongly suggest that libgtkxmhtml *NOT* be used for
the help browser.
gilgamesh:~# apt-get install libgtkxmhtml-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
gdk-imlib-dev gdk-imlib1 gnome-bin gnome-libs-data imlib-ba
10 matches
Mail list logo
