Hi,
> I talked to Raster right after the first email arrived and he said he
> would take care of it. I was hoping to give him a running start before
> the ugly free software posse jumped him. I must say that this mailing list
> has degenerated into something akin to a Microsoft legal newsgroup. S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spontaneously blurts out:
>
> On 25 Jun, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> >> He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think
> >> about possible solutions for this conflict.
>
> > Don't they think this is demanding some _action_ (like reverting that
> > patch)? "mee
On 25 Jun, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>> He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think
>> about possible solutions for this conflict.
> Don't they think this is demanding some _action_ (like reverting that
> patch)? "meet next week" and "possible solutions" sounds, well, not
> ver
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 05:05:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think about
> possible solutions for this conflict.
Don't they think this is demanding some _action_ (like reverting that
patch)? "meet next week" and "possible soluti
Hiho!
I talked to Christian Kreibich, the author of the codemixture and he
told me that it was a mistake to publish the code in this form and
that he'll undo that step.
He and Raster are going to meet next week and then they'll think about
possible solutions for this conflict.
--
Servus,
