Dear Marco,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Hi Roman, I am afraid of being a bit off topic (see below).
I am wondering about this:
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Documentation:Main
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723512
Why are you choosing this tool
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:00:55PM +1000, Roman Joost wrote:
What I do know is, that publican would not lower the barrier for writers
to contribute new content to the manual, since it still uses DocBook.
I did consider looking into asciidoc[1] tho, since asciidoc provides the
same semantic
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:07:24AM +0200, scl wrote:
Hi,
Marco's post reminds me that I lately read about the GNOME
documentation project switching from DocBook to Mallard [1].
This is concerning. I never took Mallard as a big contender, since it
doesn't solve any of the problems with
Dear Marco,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Hi Roman, I am afraid of being a bit off topic (see below).
I am wondering about this:
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Documentation:Main
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723512
Why are you choosing this tool
Hi Roman, I am afraid of being a bit off topic (see below).
I am wondering about this:
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Documentation:Main
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723512
Why are you choosing this tool (publican)?
Have you considered po4a[1] eventually with the aid of sisu[2]
[1]
