Re: [Gimp-user] lcd or crt monitor

2006-03-19 Thread Gilles Maltais
Gracia M. Littauer wrote: which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good. In the past, CRT monitors were considered better because the displayed gamut was wider, the color consistency (same color in different areas) was better and greater resolutions were offered when

Re: [Gimp-user] lcd or crt monitor

2006-03-19 Thread Akkana Peck
Gilles Maltais writes: In the past, CRT monitors were considered better because the displayed gamut was wider, the color consistency (same color in different areas) was better and greater resolutions were offered when compared to LCDs. For basic low-end displays (the ones you see on

[Gimp-user] Re: lcd or crt monitor

2006-03-19 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-18 at 1644.03 -0500): which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good. High end CRTs (probably the only ones you can find now, and in 19-22 inches sizes, price 400-600 euros) have years of development behind them, so if you do not mind the weight

Re: [Gimp-user] lcd or crt monitor

2006-03-19 Thread Kocsis Antal
Hi! I not tested today's best LCD monitors... but while there are differences in colors while you move your head before an LCD monitor, the CRT monitor is better for professional use! Anti On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 09:41 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote: Gilles Maltais writes: In the past, CRT monitors

[Gimp-user] the difference between resoloution and size

2006-03-19 Thread udi koren
what is the difference between resoloution and size? between a picture with height:100; width:100 and resolution:200 to height:100; width:100 and resolution:400 ? Udi ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

[Gimp-user] Re: the difference between resoloution and size

2006-03-19 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-19 at 2348.25 +0200): what is the difference between resoloution and size? between a picture with height:100; width:100 and resolution:200 to height:100; width:100 and resolution:400 ? Udi Resolution is a hint for the real world print size and size is the pixels

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: the difference between resoloution and size

2006-03-19 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-19 at 2339.24 +0100): Hi! ... and is there any difference in picture if I set: 100x100 in 400dpi or 200x200 in 100dpi and make a print from it (in same size - 10cm x 10cm for example)? Then it is not 400 or 100 DPI, but (rounding to 1 inch = 2.5 cm) a 4

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: the difference between resoloution and size

2006-03-19 Thread scott s.
GSR - FR wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-19 at 2339.24 +0100): Hi! ... and is there any difference in picture if I set: 100x100 in 400dpi or 200x200 in 100dpi and make a print from it (in same size - 10cm x 10cm for example)? Then it is not 400 or 100 DPI, but (rounding to 1

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: the difference between resoloution and size

2006-03-19 Thread Bob Long
On Monday, March 20, 2006 12:02 PM [GMT+1=CET], scott s. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] I have been trying to understand this better myself. I couldn't find any good help on it. Although it focuses on scanning, this has an explantion of pixels, dpi, images, printing, etc.:

Re: [Gimp-user] lcd or crt monitor

2006-03-19 Thread Tim Jedlicka
On 3/18/06, Gracia M. Littauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: which is preferred for graphics? I've heard that lcd is not good.The Shootsmarter site has a decent article on comparing CRTs to LCDs. http://www.shootsmarter.com/infocenter/wc041.html ___ Gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: the difference between resoloution and size

2006-03-19 Thread udi koren
Thanks a lot to all of you :- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user