Hi,
Stefaan Himpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my opinion
it is a shame that some good hackers are wasting their time on this
codebase.
Which begs for the question: why is current gimp not extended to
include the film-gimp specific features?
Who says it isn't? GAP already provides
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which begs for the question: why is current gimp not extended to
include the film-gimp specific features?
Who says it isn't? GAP already provides quite a lot of that
functionality (and more). Other features such as support for more
color spaces are
Hi,
Mark Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last week I attended a public meeting chaired by the cinepaint project
lead. I know very little about the reasons behind the cinepaint/gimp
split. I do think it's unfortunate that the split is hindering the
development of an open-source image
Mark Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, the most important feature of filmgimp/cinepaint is the
support for greater than 8 bits per color component (16 bit integer
and 32 bit floating point).
Hear, hear!
This is the only reason I have filmgimp on my system - the ability to
edit 16-bit
