Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-07 Thread Johan Vromans
gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 05 October 2007 00:44:14 Johan Vromans wrote: This is not stictly on topic for this list To make it even more off-topic: it doesn't work for me (FireFox 2.0), even after fixing the quotes around Javascript... -- Johan

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-07 Thread Chris Mohler
On 10/7/07, Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 05 October 2007 00:44:14 Johan Vromans wrote: This is not stictly on topic for this list To make it even more off-topic: it doesn't work for me (FireFox 2.0), even after fixing the quotes

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-07 Thread gimp_user
On Sunday 07 October 2007 00:26:54 Johan Vromans wrote: gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 05 October 2007 00:44:14 Johan Vromans wrote: This is not stictly on topic for this list To make it even more off-topic: it doesn't work for me (FireFox 2.0), even after fixing the quotes

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-05 Thread Johan Vromans
Leon Brooks GIMP [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One possible/partial answer is to use some JavaScript to read the window's dimensions alter the width height parameters of the IMG tag to scale whatever you provide, so it fits. This will still cause the whole image (which may be large) to be

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-05 Thread gimp_user
On Friday 05 October 2007 00:44:14 Johan Vromans wrote: Leon Brooks GIMP [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One possible/partial answer is to use some JavaScript to read the window's dimensions alter the width height parameters of the IMG tag to scale whatever you provide, so it fits. This will

[Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-04 Thread David Heino
Hello, If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV? ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-04 Thread gimp_user
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:03:14 David Heino wrote: Hello, If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV? Think in pixels. If you need to cater for full screen digital projection 1024x768

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-04 Thread Leon Brooks GIMP
On Friday 05 October 2007 00:03:14 David Heino wrote: is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV? There ain't no simple answer to that. A simple laptop screen starts at about 1024x768 pixels (dots) so a 72DPI picture to cover that

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-04 Thread Konstantin Svist
David Heino wrote: If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV? DPI has nothing to do with screen resolution. On screen, most images are displayed pixel-for-pixel (unless the application is

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-04 Thread Bob Long
From: David Heino [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV? Read here: http://scantips.com/no72dpi.html More information about resolution, DPI etc. from the main site:

Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution

2007-10-04 Thread Asif Lodhi
Hi Leon, Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 06:57:39 +1000 From: Leon Brooks GIMP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu .. One possible/partial answer is to use some JavaScript to read the window's dimensions alter the width height