Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-07-12 Thread John Culleton
On Monday 21 June 2010 14:11:58 Martin Nordholts wrote: On 06/21/2010 08:00 PM, John Culleton wrote: And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK? We know we need CMYK sooner or later, but higher bit depths and non-destructiveness is much more important. So first good support for the

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-07-12 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:02 PM, John Culleton wrote: Hey, I may not live that long :). Krita has had CMYK for years. But of course Krita lacks the full feature set of Gimp. Maybe some of that Krita code could be lifted for Gimp, just as InDesign lifted important features from TeX. The

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote: Is it still being worked on?  If so, is there any word on availability? When it's ready is the best you can get :) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ Gimp-user mailing list

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 06/21/2010 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote: Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word on availability? When it's ready is the best you can get :) There is more to say. Right now the top priority is to get GIMP 2.8

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread John Culleton
On Monday 21 June 2010 12:49:00 Martin Nordholts wrote: On 06/21/2010 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote: Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word on availability? When it's ready is the best you can get :) There is

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 06/21/2010 08:00 PM, John Culleton wrote: And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK? We know we need CMYK sooner or later, but higher bit depths and non-destructiveness is much more important. So first good support for the latter, then we can begin looking into proper support for the

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Branko Vukelic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:00 PM, John Culleton j...@wexfordpress.com wrote: And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK? I think 2-4 years is more than enough for CMYK (hopefully). Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. It gets the job done, and very reliable. Latest version supports clipping paths,

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 6/21/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. Or CMYKTool Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Branko Vukelic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/21/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. Or CMYKTool Prokudine, Veering a bit OT now, I've tried to use CMYKTool, and got an impression it was a bit redundant for separate+

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 6/22/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. Or CMYKTool Prokudine, Vukelic? :) Veering a bit OT now, I've tried to use CMYKTool, and got an impression it was a bit redundant for separate+ users. Does it have anything to add (or do anything differently)? Well, if

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Branko Vukelic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/22/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. Or CMYKTool Prokudine, Vukelic? :) Sure. I don't see how either of them make the other one redundant. Wise people use both,