[Gimp-user] COMDEX debrief

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is my defense of carol's arguments. 1. Yosh is pretty darn right about who did what with regard to COMDEX. 2. I don't feel a need to justify my role here in this community to you. ~ Especially since no one else seems to mind my commitment. 3.

Re: [Gimp-user] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Raymond Ostertag
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:00:51 +0100 David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I consider important) back on track. LOCATION So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some -

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote: | Am 18.11.03, 22:49 +0100 schrieb Sven Neumann: | | |correction filters. If these plug-ins and modules all use lcms and |share ICC profiles by means of gimprc and parasites, you could use | | | Have gimps configure an header

[Gimp-user] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I consider important) back on track. LOCATION So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some - points. 1) GUADEC 2) Lyon 3) London 4) Dublin 5) Chemnitz Are there others? We

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 12:00, David Neary wrote: I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I consider important) back on track. Good idea. LOCATION So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some - points. 1)

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi Henrik, thanks for the feedback. Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: LOCATION Personally I think it would be best to piggy-back on an existing event given that the organizers wouldn't mind, of course. This would give us the benefit of an existing infrastructure. In this case, what IT events

Re: [Gimp-user] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi Andrew, Andrew Langdon-Davies wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:00:51 +0100, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOCATION snip Are there others? We need volunteers. Barcelona, Catalonia (near Spain)? Site of the Universal Forum of Cultures 2004, and probably also of an alternative forum

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In this case, what IT events do people know of in the timescale we're looking at? GUADEC obviously fits, the Chemnitz event is a little early for my tastes, but is certainly an option. What other events are there that people know about? Well, there

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kai-Uwe Behrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have gimps configure an header check for lcms allready onboard? This would help plug-ins to easily link against liblcms? I don't see how a configure check in GIMP would help plug-ins so the answer to the question doesn't really matter. I'll give

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi, Branko Collin wrote: Sven suggested (IIRC), Hacking Extreme http://www.hex2005.org, the follow-up event to Hackers At Large in 2001, but that is of course still more than one and a half year away. The advantage, from what I understood, and IIRC, was that it tied into a networked

[Gimp-user] Re: Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-11-21 at 0834.36 +0100): This would be fine for unix based systems too. Are there any plans to create an system interface for X to plug-in an CMM? Do You know someone allready working on this? apropos Xcms should give you some man pages, here it does. If one checks the

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
GSR - FR wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-11-21 at 0834.36 +0100): This would be fine for unix based systems too. Are there any plans to create an system interface for X to plug-in an CMM? Do You know someone allready working on this? apropos Xcms should give you some man pages, here it does. If

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
David Neary wrote: Also, I think local LUGs and any GUG's should be invovled with our gimpcon. It would be a great place for user-developer exchange. And a great place to teach everyone more about using the gimp. This might increase your number estimates. FACILITIES What facilities do we