Hi,
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 07:36, Owen wrote:
do you have a /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libexif.pc or is it in
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/libexif.pc
If the latter, the quick and dirty answer is to copy it to
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/
The more correct way is to do:
export
On Friday 26 March 2004 07:08 pm, David Neary wrote:
Hi John,
John Culleton wrote:
There are some files hidden somewhere that
I can't find that are preventing a usable product. I'll
just wait until the next partition swap time and
install 2.0 from scratch.
If you run ldd
---BeginMessage---
Aha! But after DJ's useful input on installing the gtk-x-devel package in
order to get GTK to compile properly, I have since to go on and compile a
brand new shiny GIMP 2.0.
For those who haven't had the same problems, I'm sorry, but in the interests
of others who might
Hello
However, if you look through the output of the ./configure script, you will
find several WARNING: labels where non-essential things are missing. But some
of these non-essential things are actually quite essential to you, like the
modules to let you print, use .tiff formats etc. Here's
- Forwarded message from Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Hi,
I forward this message to the user list as the thread begun there.
I have done a replied to the message I got from Carol addressed to me a
cc to the web list.
Please Carol, don't do cross-threading [tm], we become
Without difficulty, I downloaded the Fedora rpm and am now happily
playing with Gimp 2.0. Nice work, everyone!
However, when I attempted to download the tarball and do the
./configure, I get the following message:
checking for gimp-2.0... Package gimp-2.0 was not found in the
pkg-config
Le 27.03.2004 18:09, Elaine Normandy a écrit :
Without difficulty, I downloaded the Fedora rpm and am now happily
playing with Gimp 2.0. Nice work, everyone!
However, when I attempted to download the tarball and do the ./
configure, I get the following message:
checking for gimp-2.0...
