Hi,
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:12 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
>
> Of course you are right. My problem was that I copied the selection
> into a new layer with transparency as the fill type. I don't really
> understand what happened, but it appears the transparency was being
> averaged, so after
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:25 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 08:12 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
>
> > > Copy your selection, paste it to a new layer and blur that layer. Does
> > > that give the desired result?
> >
> > I don't believe so. I tried it. It still used p
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 08:12 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
> > Copy your selection, paste it to a new layer and blur that layer. Does
> > that give the desired result?
>
> I don't believe so. I tried it. It still used pixels outside the
> selection in computing the new pixel values in the
Leonard Evens wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 08:39 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 21:24 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
> > > I want to blur the sky so that only pixels in the selection are used in
> > > computing the new values. Also, I need to use a large blur ra
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 08:39 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 21:24 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
> > I want to blur the sky so that only pixels in the selection are used in
> > computing the new values. Also, I need to use a large blur radius.
> > I've done this in the pas
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 21:24 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
> I want to blur the sky so that only pixels in the selection are used in
> computing the new values. Also, I need to use a large blur radius.
> I've done this in the past by starting off with a small blur raidus and
> progressively redu
I want to blur the sky so that only pixels in the selection are used in
computing the new values. Also, I need to use a large blur radius.
I've done this in the past by starting off with a small blur raidus and
progressively reducing the selection, increasing the (gaussian) blur
radius as I did so
