On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:14:15AM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:52:52AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Steve, please don't be so ignorant.
This seems a bit rude and uncalled for.
well, gimp developers are not known for being polite in all situations.
pointing out when
Hi,
Steve Crane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:00:01PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
USM with radius 60, amount 0.30 and threshold 1.
without having the chance (or a photo handy) to check this with, are you
certain that unsharp mask is better than using levels?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:52:52AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Steve, please don't be so ignorant.
This seems a bit rude and uncalled for.
Carol has a point here. If unsharp
mask is slow, it makes sense to look for alternatives.
Of course it does.
There's no
point in sticking to your
Steve Crane wrote:
I am adapting a workflow from a Photoshop action and there is one step
that does haze removal with USM using radius 60, amount 0.30 and
threshold 1, that is extremely slow. I just timed it on a 94.4MB 4048x3040
photograph and it took 3 minutes, 50 seconds.
That sounds
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 08:18:14AM -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
Does Photoshop do it a lot faster with the same parameters?
Very much so. I created a panorama earlier this evening and ran it
through the workflow action I'm porting to GIMP and the haze removal
step took only a few seconds, and
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 08:57:46PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 08:18:14AM -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
Does Photoshop do it a lot faster with the same parameters?
Very much so. I created a panorama earlier this evening and ran it
through the workflow action I'm
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 01:05:29PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
what did you use for haze removal?
USM with radius 60, amount 0.30 and threshold 1.
--
Steve Crane
http://craniac.afraid.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:33:33PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 01:05:29PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
what did you use for haze removal?
USM with radius 60, amount 0.30 and threshold 1.
without having the chance (or a photo handy) to check this with, are you
certain
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:00:01PM -0700, carol wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:33:33PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 01:05:29PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
what did you use for haze removal?
USM with radius 60, amount 0.30 and threshold 1.
without having the
