Re: "Focusing" for photo images

2000-04-20 Thread pixel fairy
Rick Rosinski wrote: > Is there an algorithm in Gimp that can be used to "focus" a photograph that is > out of focus? Or, is there a series of steps that I can do to "focus" the > photograph?. Thanks. you can also sharpen the image slightly right after you scan it. you have to be carefull not

Re: Mask not saved?

2000-04-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you want to save an image in a web browsable format. YOU MUST flatten the image. (right click in the layers window) s@m On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Scott Thomason wrote: > No, no

Image slice

2000-04-20 Thread Paul
Is there a plugin/script that I could use, to slice a particular image into 6 or 7 parts, then assign a URL to each piece..like in Adobe ImageReady? I'm using Gimp 1.1.19 Thanks for any info

Re: "Focusing" for photo images

2000-04-20 Thread Jon Winters
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rick Rosinski wrote: > Is there an algorithm in Gimp that can be used to "focus" a photograph that is > out of focus? Or, is there a series of steps that I can do to "focus" the > photograph?. Thanks. > > Hello Rick, Check out the excellent Warp Sharp Script-Fu. http:/

"Focusing" for photo images

2000-04-20 Thread Rick Rosinski
Is there an algorithm in Gimp that can be used to "focus" a photograph that is out of focus? Or, is there a series of steps that I can do to "focus" the photograph?. Thanks. -- Rick Rosinski http://rickrosinski.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mask not saved?

2000-04-20 Thread alex
Hi, Scott Thomason wrote: > > I must be missing something basic? > ---scott I can suggest, that you miss "apply mask" command (it is somewhere at right-click on masked layer in layer/channel dialogue) Alex -- // Only the fireborn understand blue. ___

Re: Mask not saved?

2000-04-20 Thread Scott Thomason
No, no, I'm DONE working on the image and I want to save it in a web-browser-viewable format. Perhaps I shouldn't have used the term "mask"; I did a selection-to-channel, then blurred the channel. When viewing with both the original, single layer AND the mask/channel, it looks great...now I want t