Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:07 AM, josephbupe wrote:

 Many times I am working with GIMP I want to like draw shapes on the same
 transparent layer and later move them around in different positions. However,
 it's not easy (in GIMP) to just select an area of a given shape and reposition
 it on the same layer without using cut and paste.

You mean, Ctrl+Alt+dragging a selection is not easy? :)

Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread josephbupe
Sorry, I forgot to attach.

Attachments:
* http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/114/original/select-move.png

-- 
josephbupe (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread josephbupe
You mean, Ctrl+Alt+dragging a selection is not easy? :)

Alexandre

Thanx Alenxandre. I spent the whole time trying to figure this out.

It's easy.



-- 
josephbupe (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] greek letters

2014-05-16 Thread gimppimpf
Hi Gary,

thanks a lot - that perfekt answer will help me. I must build a
starmap with the starnames. For Example alpha Gemini, but the word
alpha must be a greek letter. The rest ist normal text.

By Gimppimpf

Hi togehter,

sorry, but the trick dont work. See picture. Any Idea, what is wrong?

It must be (alpha) Castor.p 

By GP

Attachments:
* http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/115/original/unicode_problem.jpg

-- 
gimppimpf (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread Richard
 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 09:23:15 +0200
 From: for...@gimpusers.com
 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 CC: notificati...@gimpusers.com
 Subject: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool
 
 Sorry, I forgot to attach.
 
 Attachments:
 * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/114/original/select-move.png
 
 -- 
 josephbupe (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Judging from that screenshot, it looks like in Paint.net when you draw a 
geometric shape (circle, rectangle, etc.) it displays selection handles that 
enable you to move or alter said shape as a separate drawing object (like how 
GIMP handles ellipse/rectangle selections).  

GIMP has basically no support for this kind of object manipulation at this 
time, though I agree that in some cases having a few 'vector objects' as their 
own discrete layers (a la text objects and layers) would be very, very 
convenient.

-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com

Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
  
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
16 мая 2014 г. 18:17 пользователь Richard strata_ran...@hotmail.com
написал:

 GIMP has basically no support for this kind of
 object manipulation at this time, though I agree
 that in some cases having a few 'vector objects'
 as their own discrete layers (a la text objects
 and layers) would be very, very convenient.

Just for precision's sake, GIMP has a backend for vector layers, without UI
(there _was_ initial UI, it was never merged). But the code hasn't been
touched in years, and I've my suspicions about its usefulness.

Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread Richard
 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:24:17 +0400
 From: alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com
 CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool
 
 16 мая 2014 г. 18:17 пользователь Richard strata_ran...@hotmail.com
 написал:
 
  GIMP has basically no support for this kind of
  object manipulation at this time, though I agree
  that in some cases having a few 'vector objects'
  as their own discrete layers (a la text objects
  and layers) would be very, very convenient.
 
 Just for precision's sake, GIMP has a backend for vector layers, without UI
 (there _was_ initial UI, it was never merged). But the code hasn't been
 touched in years, and I've my suspicions about its usefulness.
 
 Alexandre
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list

Take Paths for example:  Path objects do not have attached layer data, meaning 
that every time you adjust a path you have to re-stroke it onto a target 
surface.  Contrast with text objects, which do have an attached layer that 
updates automatically as you change the underlying text or rendering style 
(font face, color, etc.)

(I also find GIMP's path editing controls very confusing compared to Inkscape, 
but that's a different matter.)

-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com

Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
  
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Richard wrote:

 Take Paths for example:  Path objects do not have attached layer data,
 meaning that every time you adjust a path you have to re-stroke it onto a
 target surface.

Oh, that. Øyvind might need to correct me, but basic stroking of
SVG-based paths is done in GEGL. We have an op for that :)

Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP move tool

2014-05-16 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Richard wrote:

 Take Paths for example:  Path objects do not have attached layer data,
 meaning that every time you adjust a path you have to re-stroke it onto a
 target surface.

 Oh, that. Øyvind might need to correct me, but basic stroking of
 SVG-based paths is done in GEGL. We have an op for that :)

The gegl:path op (or a similar one), is the foundation that seems
natural to base vector layers on. The gegl:text op isn't as powerful
as GIMPs text tool yet; but is other, and similar, rendering code that
ideally would be migrated to a GEGL op.

/Øyvind
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] Text tool: Toolbox vs. on-canvas options

2014-05-16 Thread Richard
As much as I love the new on-canvas text editing in GIMP 2.8, I do run into 
some creative disputes with the on-canvas text editor from time to time

My main issue is that the on-canvas options are used to provide local style 
overrides (e.g. emphasizing a word here or there) and have no connection to the 
default settings for the text object as a whole.  Local style overrides are 
good and all, but there are some scenarios where you might think (even expect) 
the on-canvas options to change the default for the text object as a whole, and 
they don't.  And not understanding that these are separate settings leads to 
problems down the road, such as:

1 - If there is no selection inside the text, the on-canvas controls have no 
immediate (visible) effect; they appear to not work because there is no 
selection to affect.  GIMP makes no attempts to divine whether you intended to 
change the default style or specify a new one to start typing with (which is a 
rightly thorny issue by itself).  As an alternative idea - you know how if you 
double-click it selects the current word, and if you triple-click it selects 
all text in the object?  How about adding an intermediary step where it selects 
all nearby words that share the same style?  E.g. 2 clicks - current word; 3 
clicks - current style; 4 clicks - all text

(Another alternative would be, in the Layers dialog, display a text object like 
a layer group instead of a single layer, similar to the display of an XML tree. 
 But I'm sure the technical implementation would be horribly complex :[  )

2 - Inversely, select all text in the object and then make some adjustment to 
it (font face/size/color).  This has the same (visible) effect as changing the 
default style, but again, technically you are specifying a local style that 
just happens to cover the length of the entire text object and GIMP is making 
no attempts to discern whether that was actually your intent.  The immediate 
result is - if the cursor is placed at the start of the text object then any 
insertions are typed using the default style, while if the cursor is placed at 
the end, any insertions are typed using the local style.  I don't really see 
any ideal alternative behavior here (word processors in general tend to do the 
same thing) outside of just don't do that. 

3 - Related to #2:  When creating a text object, click once to get started, but 
before the initial typing, make some adjustments via on-canvas controls (again, 
font face/size/color).  Again, whether you realize/expect it or not you are 
typing using a local style override that is not affected by the default options 
in the toolbox.

4 - If you use the on-canvas controls to specify a setting that happens to 
match as the default (toolbox) options, it is actually -not- the same setting 
but invisibly different.  E.g. type Lorem Ipsum at 24px size; then change the 
word Lorem to 28; then change it back to 24 (do not Undo this; change it back 
manually). Now adjust the default font size in the toolbox; the word Lorem 
does not change in size because it's not actually using the default size, it's 
using a local size that just -coincidentally matches- the default size.  (A 
similar thing applies with font face and color.)  Here, the on-canvas Font Face 
and Font Size boxes could benefit from an additional entry (labelled default 
or something) to identify when a given section of text is using the default 
face/size or not; there's no easy way to tell at the moment.

5 - Speaking of font sizes, an option/setting/preference to scale local font 
sizes (on-canvas options) relative to changes made in the default size (toolbox 
options) would be stellar.  Say I'm using 'small caps' to emphasize words or 
phrases in one of my text objects -- which I do by typing the emphasized words 
in ALLCAPS and then shrinking their text size by a notch (e.g. 20 px default 
style - 16 px local style).  Some time later I want to scale my text object 
from a default of 20px to 40px and I do -- but my smallcaps words are stuck at 
16px and I have to resize them manually.  If I was choosing a different form of 
emphasis (bold/italic) this would not be a problem, but as it stands

6 - And, out of two years' occasional GIMP 2.8 usage I did not even once 
realize there was a button in the on-canvas box labelled clear style of 
selected text.  (A.k.a. the 'revert' button.)  How come I never noticed it 
before?  . . . I'm thinking maybe because its icon is a -paintbrush-.  (Y'know, 
an interior decorating paintbrush like you'd buy at a home improvement store 
instead of an art store.)  See, paintbrushes are tools that 'do' stuff, not 
'undo' stuff.  Shouldn't the icon be an eraser instead?  Or even that 
arrow-circling-about-back-to-itself like we have on every other 
reset-to-default button in every toolbox?

I also have some gripes about the placement of the 'clear style' button (now 
that I'm aware of it) in the on-canvas toolbox, but that's eclipsed 

[Gimp-user] Gimp-Perl version 2.30_03 now on CPAN

2014-05-16 Thread Ed .
Dear Gimp Users,

The latest dev version of Gimp-Perl (2.30_03) is now on CPAN. You can take a 
look here:

http://search.cpan.org/~etj/Gimp-2.30_03/

Currently only tested on Linux, but I would be very interested if someone would 
try it on Windows (take a look at README.win32 for possible ideas).

Let me know what you think.

All the best,
Ed J
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list