Re: [Gimp-user] Coachman
Adding in my two cents: http://mfisherart.blogspot.com/2013/08/cover-work.html I used many, many layers and mask effects to do that work, but it was worth it! On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, udan for...@gimpusers.com wrote: as usual I've post some WIP images in my blog: http://prenudos.com/2013/08/07/cocheiro/ Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/65/original/cocheiro.jpg -- udan (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Coachman
Very nice! I'm curious, do you use some kind of pad + stylus to draw these, or just a mouse? ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
Second! I for one appreciate what the GIMP developers have worked so hard to produce. Spectacular program for the price! Stuart Rauh -Original Message- From: gimp-user-list [mailto:gimp-user-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Shanahan Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:48 PM To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior * Yottskry for...@gimpusers.com [08-07-13 15:12]: [...] The best thing that can happen to GIMP now is that the current developers all experience some sort of programming-related long term memory loss and the project can be taken over by people who care about what users think. Or that users such as yourself pay someone to develop and provide software more to their *particular* liking and leave gimp and the gimp mail lists! After all, the money you pay for gimp definitely does not support your wishes. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 8/8/2013 1:47 PM, maderios wrote: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs. export, etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Greetings -- Maderios You try to satisfy everybody nobody ends up satisfied. If enough people want it, they can fork it. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, maderios wrote: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs. export, etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who cares about them, eh? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08/08/2013 03:47 PM, maderios wrote: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion save vs. export, etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Greetings I'm just a user, and do not speak for anybody other than myself, but... Your approach would mean maintaining *two* different programs which would continue to diverge over time. I very much doubt that the developers have the energy to do that -- sometimes it seems that they don't have enough energy to do all that they would like with just one version. It seems to me that the developer's point of view is that amateurs should use a simpler program and not use Gimp at all. This is open-source software. You are welcome to become a developer, fork the project, and do all this yourself or you can build a team to do it. Or you can hire people to do it for you. But asking the developers -- all volunteers -- to increase their workload (the divergence would keep widening over time) is not how things work in open-source software as I understand it. If my vote counted (which it does not because I am not in the target user group), I would vote against this export requirement also. However, I know better than to waste more energy on the subject. Jay ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
