Steve, that's wonderful -- hand roll my own shadows! Seems so simple and
obvious after it's explained that I wonder why I ever thought I needed a
plug-in for this.
So cool!
Thanks, Steve
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 10:32 PM, Helen wrote:
> > I have an i
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 22:32:39 -0400
> From: etter...@gmail.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: [Gimp-user] drop shadow
>
> I have an image with two rectangular photos, in separate layers.
> I want each photo to have a drop shadow. No matter what I do,
> I keep getting the drop shado
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Apple sucks and doesn't allow GPL in the App store.
>
Apple will unofficially allow it but as soon as much as a single
contributor toots the GNU horn about distribution restrictions and license
conflict they'll immediately pull it from t
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Sam Gleske wrote:
> Isn't the purpose of GEGL integration attempting to pull as much of the
> graphical functions out of GIMP as possible so that GUI could be switched
> but the underlying library has the same quality of image manipulation?
>
> If that's not the ca
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:Oh, I don't know...
>
> 32bit per color channel precision?
> Graph-based non-destructive processing?
>
> :)
Right, it has features. Being that it's a library is it not to provide
some abstraction and he
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Sam Gleske wrote:
> Right, it has features. Being that it's a library is it not to provide
> some abstraction and help simplify the implementation? As it is in a
> library, writing another GUI on top of it would be possible and
> considerably easier than previous
