[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:00:51PM +0100, David Neary wrote: > I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I > consider important) back on track. > > LOCATION > > So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, > each of which has some + points and some - points.

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

David Neary wrote: Also, I think local LUGs and any GUG's should be invovled with our gimpcon. It would be a great place for user-developer exchange. And a great place to teach everyone more about using the gimp. This might increase your number estimates. FACILITIES What facilities do we ne

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

Hi, Branko Collin wrote: > Sven suggested (IIRC), Hacking Extreme , the > follow-up event to Hackers At Large in 2001, but that is of course > still more than one and a half year away. The advantage, from what I > understood, and IIRC, was that it tied into a networked c

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: > I expect that 2004 will see another Hackmeeting but the webpage > doesn't mention a date nor a place yet: > http://www.hackmeeting.org/2003/history_en > Perhaps someone knows more about the plans for 2004. I heard a lot of > good things about past Hackmeetings and it woul

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In this case, what IT events do people know of in the timescale > we're looking at? GUADEC obviously fits, the Chemnitz event is a > little early for my tastes, but is certainly an option. What other > events are there that people know about? Well, t

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

Hi Henrik, thanks for the feedback. Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > LOCATION > > Personally I think it would be best to piggy-back on an existing event > given that the organizers wouldn't mind, of course. This would give us > the benefit of an existing infrastructure. In this case, what IT ev

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

Hi, On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 12:00, David Neary wrote: > I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I > consider important) back on track. Good idea. > LOCATION > > So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, > each of which has some + points and some - points