> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Cannot compile gimp 2.0.x on RHAT9 --> GTK+2 not
> found
>
> Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Nah, just a bit lack of knowledge on your side ;)
Thanks for clearing it up. I'm not too experienced with GNOME utils.
And I see that the .pc files are qu
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 10:27:02AM -0700, Jeffery Cann wrote:
>
> OK. So I download, compile and install gtk+-2.2.4 into default
> location of /usr/local. Redhat put gtk+ 1.x in another location
> (/usr/lib and /usr/share)
>
> When I run the gimp configure program after the GTK+ 2.2.4
> installa
Jeffery Cann wrote:
There appears to be no way to tell gimp's configure script where to
find the GTK+ 2.2.4 version in /usr/local/lib. If there is, PLEASE
tell me!
Tell pkg-config where it should find GTK+
So, the INSTALL file contradicts itself by saying that 1) GTK+ 1 and
2 can coexist, but tha
