Re: [Gimp-user] Filter / Nature doesnt work above a certain resolution

2007-05-10 Thread Axel Wernicke
Hi, Am 10.05.2007 um 08:35 schrieb Sven Neumann: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> 5669x3969pixels, 72dpi. (200x140 cm) >> Then i add the flame filter... and nothing with resolutions that >> high. >> Works fine in the same Session when using the flame fi

Re: [Gimp-user] Filter / Nature doesnt work above a certain resolution

2007-05-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 5669x3969pixels, 72dpi. (200x140 cm) > Then i add the flame filter... and nothing with resolutions that high. > Works fine in the same Session when using the flame filter on e.g. a > 640x480pixel image, and it seems to have somethi

Re: [Gimp-user] Filter / Nature doesnt work above a certain resolution

2007-05-09 Thread canu
.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] Filter / Nature doesnt work above acertain resolution > I will take a wild guess that when working with your larger image, you > have the filter's camera settings "zoomed out" enough that the result > is not visible (thi

Re: [Gimp-user] Filter / Nature doesnt work above a certain resolution

2007-05-09 Thread saulgoode
I will take a wild guess that when working with your larger image, you have the filter's camera settings "zoomed out" enough that the result is not visible (this would explain the quick execution of the filter). If adjusting your camera settings does not solve your problem, perhaps you could