On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:02 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> Hey, I may not live that long :<). Krita has had CMYK for
> years. But of course Krita lacks the full feature set of Gimp.
> Maybe some of that Krita code could be lifted for Gimp, just
> as InDesign lifted important features from TeX.
The d
On Monday 21 June 2010 14:11:58 Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 08:00 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> > And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK?
>
> We know we need CMYK sooner or later, but higher bit
depths and
> non-destructiveness is much more important. So first
good support for
> the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On 6/22/10, Branko Vukelic wrote:
>
Meanwhile, give separate+ a go.
>>>
>>> Or CMYKTool
>>
>> Prokudine,
>
> Vukelic? :)
Sure.
> I don't see how either of them make the other one redundant. Wise
> people use both, depending on
On 6/22/10, Branko Vukelic wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, give separate+ a go.
>>
>> Or CMYKTool
>
> Prokudine,
Vukelic? :)
> Veering a bit OT now, I've tried to use CMYKTool, and got an
> impression it was a bit redundant for separate+ users. Does it have
> anything to add (or do anything differently)?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On 6/21/10, Branko Vukelic wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile, give separate+ a go.
>
> Or CMYKTool
Prokudine,
Veering a bit OT now, I've tried to use CMYKTool, and got an
impression it was a bit redundant for separate+ users. Does it have
anythi
On 6/21/10, Branko Vukelic wrote:
> Meanwhile, give separate+ a go.
Or CMYKTool
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:00 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK?
I think 2-4 years is more than enough for CMYK (hopefully).
Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. It gets the job done, and very
reliable. Latest version supports clipping paths, and saving to CMYK
TIFF
On 06/21/2010 08:00 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK?
We know we need CMYK sooner or later, but higher bit depths and
non-destructiveness is much more important. So first good support for
the latter, then we can begin looking into proper support for the forme
On Monday 21 June 2010 12:49:00 Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> >> Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word
> >> on availability?
> >
> > "When it's ready" is the best you can get :)
On 06/21/2010 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
>> Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word
>> on availability?
>
> "When it's ready" is the best you can get :)
There is more to say.
Right now the top priority is to get GIMP 2
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word
> on availability?
"When it's ready" is the best you can get :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gim
11 matches
Mail list logo