Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-07-12 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:02 PM, John Culleton wrote: > Hey, I may not live that long :<). Krita has had CMYK for > years. But of course Krita lacks the full feature set of Gimp. > Maybe some of that Krita code could be lifted for Gimp, just > as InDesign lifted important features from TeX. The d

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-07-12 Thread John Culleton
On Monday 21 June 2010 14:11:58 Martin Nordholts wrote: > On 06/21/2010 08:00 PM, John Culleton wrote: > > And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK? > > We know we need CMYK sooner or later, but higher bit depths and > non-destructiveness is much more important. So first good support for > the

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Branko Vukelic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On 6/22/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: > Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. >>> >>> Or CMYKTool >> >> Prokudine, > > Vukelic? :) Sure. > I don't see how either of them make the other one redundant. Wise > people use both, depending on

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 6/22/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: >>> Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. >> >> Or CMYKTool > > Prokudine, Vukelic? :) > Veering a bit OT now, I've tried to use CMYKTool, and got an > impression it was a bit redundant for separate+ users. Does it have > anything to add (or do anything differently)?

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Branko Vukelic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On 6/21/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: > >> Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. > > Or CMYKTool Prokudine, Veering a bit OT now, I've tried to use CMYKTool, and got an impression it was a bit redundant for separate+ users. Does it have anythi

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 6/21/10, Branko Vukelic wrote: > Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. Or CMYKTool Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Branko Vukelic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:00 PM, John Culleton wrote: > And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK? I think 2-4 years is more than enough for CMYK (hopefully). Meanwhile, give separate+ a go. It gets the job done, and very reliable. Latest version supports clipping paths, and saving to CMYK TIFF

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 06/21/2010 08:00 PM, John Culleton wrote: > And what is the priority/schedule for CMYK? We know we need CMYK sooner or later, but higher bit depths and non-destructiveness is much more important. So first good support for the latter, then we can begin looking into proper support for the forme

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread John Culleton
On Monday 21 June 2010 12:49:00 Martin Nordholts wrote: > On 06/21/2010 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote: > >> Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word > >> on availability? > > > > "When it's ready" is the best you can get :)

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 06/21/2010 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote: >> Is it still being worked on? If so, is there any word >> on availability? > > "When it's ready" is the best you can get :) There is more to say. Right now the top priority is to get GIMP 2

Re: [Gimp-user] How is 16 bit GIMP doing?

2010-06-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ken Warner wrote: > Is it still being worked on?  If so, is there any word > on availability? "When it's ready" is the best you can get :) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gim