On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 17:46 +0100, norman wrote:
> < snip >
>
> > It sounds like some color management problem, but I'm not sure exactly
> > what. To start, have you profiled your monitor? Are you choosing a
> > profile in gimp? The image viewer almost certainly is not using any
> > profile in
Hi norman,
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 8:13 PM, norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It sounds to me like norman does have color management, but his viewer
> > either doesn't support it or color management info isn't being saved.
> > To avoid these kind of problems, I convert the final image to t
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 11:21 +0100, norman wrote:
> > I have recently started comparing final images with my son where we both
> > start with the same RAW image. He uses Bibble Pro only, whereas I have
> > been u
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 11:21 +0100, norman wrote:
> I have recently started comparing final images with my son where we both
> start with the same RAW image. He uses Bibble Pro only, whereas I have
> been using UFraw and GIMP. For some reason, which he cannot explain, he
> does not like my imag
Norman, did you use camera profile *.icc when processing RAW photos with
UFRaw? If not, you photos *should* look slightly desaturated.
norman wrote:
> I have recently started comparing final images with my son where we both
> start with the same RAW image. He uses Bibble Pro only, whereas I have
