Re: [Gimp-user] gimp fonts in windows

2006-02-09 Thread Vytautas P.
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:38:11 +0200, JC Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:



Vytautas P. wrote:
I assume everybody is keeping track on thread and knows what i'm  
answering.


Sometimes email delivery is congested and delayed, resulting in messages  
received out of order.  Sometimes someone is new to the group and is  
just starting to get the posts in the middle of a discussion.  That's  
why we should always quote the *relevant* part of the prior text in our  
reply, to give context to what we are replying about.



I don't like to scroll way down through all records,


First, that is an artifact of BAD quoting - quoting all of the prior  
post.  When people ONLY quote the part they are replying to then no  
scrolling should be necessary to get to their reply.


Second, since you are writing this post for *others* to read, you should  
post it in the format that the *others* have said they want it.  That  
means no top posting.



especially on long threads. So no, I will not reply below quoted text.


So, in other words, you refuse to participate in this group in the  
manner in which everyone else participates in it because of your  
personal (and misguided) belief that in doing so you make things easier  
for yourself, even if it makes things harder for everyone else.  That's  
selfish and rude.



And yes, i'll try to quote only parts i'm answering to.


If you are willing to do that, why not just go the whole way and stop  
top posting and do it the way the rest of the group does it and the way  
that netiquette specifies is the preferred method?




If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include
just enough text of the original to give a context.

Doing it differently (quoting at the bottom and especially quoting the  
entire post at the bottom) *really* screws up quoting when there are  
nested quotes.


It would be very refreshing if you would reconsider your reasons for  
refusing to cooperate and instead give it a try to do it the way the  
group prefers, the way described in RFC 1855, a system that has worked  
well for over a decade (since 1995).  It would show that A) you aren't  
selfish and rude after all; and B) that you are willing to listen to  
arguments about why your way may not be best for the group as a whole;  
and C) that you DO care about presenting your ideas in a way that makes  
it easier for the others in the group to read them.


Thank you!

jc




I do hope it was interesting and relevant post not only for me but for  
everyone is posting.


--
Pagarbiai Vytautas
Xandros 3.0.2 OCE
Opera 8.51
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gimp fonts in windows

2006-02-09 Thread JC Dill

Vytautas P. wrote:
I assume everybody is keeping track on thread and knows what i'm 
answering.


Sometimes email delivery is congested and delayed, resulting in messages 
received out of order.  Sometimes someone is new to the group and is 
just starting to get the posts in the middle of a discussion.  That's 
why we should always quote the *relevant* part of the prior text in our 
reply, to give context to what we are replying about.


I don't like to scroll way down through all records, 


First, that is an artifact of BAD quoting - quoting all of the prior 
post.  When people ONLY quote the part they are replying to then no 
scrolling should be necessary to get to their reply.


Second, since you are writing this post for *others* to read, you should 
post it in the format that the *others* have said they want it.  That 
means no top posting.


especially on long threads. So no, I will not reply below quoted text. 


So, in other words, you refuse to participate in this group in the 
manner in which everyone else participates in it because of your 
personal (and misguided) belief that in doing so you make things easier 
for yourself, even if it makes things harder for everyone else.  That's 
selfish and rude.


And yes, i'll try to quote only parts i'm answering to. 


If you are willing to do that, why not just go the whole way and stop 
top posting and do it the way the rest of the group does it and the way 
that netiquette specifies is the preferred method?




If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include
just enough text of the original to give a context.

Doing it differently (quoting at the bottom and especially quoting the 
entire post at the bottom) *really* screws up quoting when there are 
nested quotes.


It would be very refreshing if you would reconsider your reasons for 
refusing to cooperate and instead give it a try to do it the way the 
group prefers, the way described in RFC 1855, a system that has worked 
well for over a decade (since 1995).  It would show that A) you aren't 
selfish and rude after all; and B) that you are willing to listen to 
arguments about why your way may not be best for the group as a whole; 
and C) that you DO care about presenting your ideas in a way that makes 
it easier for the others in the group to read them.


Thank you!

jc

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gimp fonts in windows

2006-02-09 Thread Vytautas P.
I assume everybody is keeping track on thread and knows what i'm  
answering. I don't like to scroll way down through all records, especially  
on long threads. So no, I will not reply below quoted text. And yes, i'll  
try to quote only parts i'm answering to. Thanks for careing.


On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:40:14 +0200, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:
P.S. could you reply below the quoted text and only quote the parts  
you're

replying to?


--
Pagarbiai Vytautas
Xandros 3.0.2 OCE
Opera 8.51
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gimp fonts in windows

2006-02-09 Thread Michael Schumacher
> Von: "Vytautas P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> GIMP>File>Preferences>Folders>Font
> Add Windows fonts folder and that should work. Restart GIMP first of  
> course. Or maybye even restart computer. Windows loves that ;)

The fontconfig configuration file usually contains this directory already,
so if the system fonts are not picked up by default on some systems, it
would be worthwile to investigate this a bit further.

P.S. could you reply below the quoted text and only quote the parts you're
replying to?


HTH,
Michael

-- 
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gimp fonts in windows

2006-02-09 Thread Vytautas P.

GIMP>File>Preferences>Folders>Font
Add Windows fonts folder and that should work. Restart GIMP first of  
course. Or maybye even restart computer. Windows loves that ;)


On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:00:32 +0200, Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


hi,
i just recommended a windows friend to use Gimp and he is actually
really happy with it. The only thing is that he needs to use Japanese
fonts with it and it seems as if Gimp doesn't let him access the regular
system fonts.  Gimp has its own font directory.
I run Gimp on Linux and i can use all fonts installed system wide.  The
thing is i don't really know much about windows and how to install fonts
or how Gimp in windows works.  Can someone maybe help me out, so i can
forward this to him?

Thanks,

Eric




--
Pagarbiai Vytautas
Xandros 3.0.2 OCE
Opera 8.51
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user