Re: [Gimp-user] run script located in an arbitrary directory
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 11:52:09AM -0800, Robert Kleemann wrote: > > (plug-in-path "/home/robert/custom-plug-ins:/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins") > > The directories will probably change when the gimp version changes but > since the scripts will likely have to be changed as well it's not a big > deal. > the ability to show the new version to the old locations will still be there though. through the preferences the same way. they try to make things backwards compatible and usually the changes needed are minor. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] run script located in an arbitrary directory
Thanks Yosh for the definitive answer. I've never looked at the gimp's code base so that would be a huge effort for me to fix this small problem. I tried Carol's solution of a custom gimprc and that seems to be a good enough solution. In order to get it to work I had to first load the standard plugins so my gimprc looked like the following: (plug-in-path "/home/robert/custom-plug-ins:/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins") The directories will probably change when the gimp version changes but since the scripts will likely have to be changed as well it's not a big deal. Thanks to everyone for their help! Robert. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] run script located in an arbitrary directory
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:33:22PM -0800, Robert Kleemann wrote: > michael chang wrote: > >perl scripts with the GIMP module can be loaded just like any > >executable script; for example, if I have a script that uses GIMP > >called myfile.pl and I go to that directory and call ./myfile.pl, it > >will run. > > > Thanks for the idea. I never thought of running the script as a > stand-alone program which uses gimp as a library. This is exactly what > I am looking for. I tried it with some code from one of my working > python plugins. I removed the "register" code and inlined the relevant > gimp calls. > Am I supposed to be able to call gimp from a standalone python program > like this? No, this does not work. Python-Fu scripts must be invoked from within GIMP. I wish michael chang actually would check his facts once in a while instead of posting wrong information. The perl bindings do the run from the command line trick by having GIMP run a plugin that listens on a socket for commands to evaluate. The script will proxy over commands to the server. If no GIMP is running, the script starts one up. You could code up similar functionality for Python-Fu. I don't know your skill level, but it wouldn't be too hard for someone with reasonable Python and GIMP clue, and if done right, worthy of being folded into the distribution. Another option is to code up a batch mode evaluator for python. Then you could provide arbitrary code on standard input. This is less complex to implement than the above. You could write a simple proxy script that lives in the plugin dir that imports your real script and runs it. And finally, you could follow Carol's suggestion in her earlier mail, that of defining another plug-in dir, and optionally selecting a different config to only pull that in when you need it. This would require no additional code at all. -Yosh ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] run script located in an arbitrary directory
michael chang wrote: perl scripts with the GIMP module can be loaded just like any executable script; for example, if I have a script that uses GIMP called myfile.pl and I go to that directory and call ./myfile.pl, it will run. Thanks for the idea. I never thought of running the script as a stand-alone program which uses gimp as a library. This is exactly what I am looking for. I tried it with some code from one of my working python plugins. I removed the "register" code and inlined the relevant gimp calls. Here is the simple python script: -- begin --- #!/usr/bin/python from gimpfu import * width = 100 height = 100 print "before call to gimp.Image" img = gimp.Image(width, height, RGB) print "after call to gimp.Image" layer = gimp.Layer(img, "layname", width, height, RGBA_IMAGE, 100, NORMAL_MODE) img.add_layer(layer, 0) pdb.gimp_image_set_active_layer(img, layer) draw = pdb.gimp_image_get_active_drawable(img) # fill solid red gimp.set_foreground((255,0,0)) pdb.gimp_selection_all(img) pdb.gimp_edit_bucket_fill(draw,0,0,100,0,0,0,0) filename="temp.tga" pdb.file_tga_save(img,draw,filename,filename,0,0) gimp.delete(img) --- end --- The first problem was that python couldn't find the gimpfu module but once I found it and added it to the path I ran into another problem: $ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python ./simple before call to gimp.Image (process:11416): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed LibGimpBase-ERROR **: could not find handler for message: 5 aborting... Aborted $ Does anyone know what any of the above errors mean? It seems to fail in the first call to gimp i.e. gimp.Image() I'm not sure why the only gimpfu on my system (a stable gentoo box) is located in a 2.0 directory. My gimp version is 2.2.8 and my python version is 2.4.2 The package manager claims that the gimpfu file belongs to the latest gimp package: # locate gimpfu /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python/gimpfu.py /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python/gimpfu.pyc /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python/gimpfu.pyo # equery b /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python/gimpfu.py [ Searching for file(s) /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python/gimpfu.py in *... ] media-gfx/gimp-2.2.8-r1 (/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python/gimpfu.py) Am I supposed to be able to call gimp from a standalone python program like this? Robert. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] run script located in an arbitrary directory
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:44:38PM -0800, Robert Kleemann wrote: > Is it possible to have gimp run a script that located in an arbitrary > directory? It seems that gimp wants to run scripts from > ~/.gimp-n.n/[plug-ins|scripts]/ > File-->Preferences there is an expander twisty for folders. from there, you can tell gimp to use "Plug-Ins" from other directories, effectively putting that directory into gimps path. this works for python and perl scripts and your compiled c plug-ins. the "Scripts" dialog would be the way to show it to other script-fu containing directories. > Given this way of using gimp, it would be very handy if I could run gimp > in some way so that it would run a specified script that is not located > in one of the standard gimp directories. > my preferences solution alone will not do this. running "gimp --gimprc " combined with setting the preferences differently there would do what you need, however. i have not tried all of this myself, it is just the approach i would take if i needed to do this. please let us know if this works for what you are trying to do. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] run script located in an arbitrary directory
On 11/21/05, Robert Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to have gimp run a script that located in an arbitrary > directory? It seems that gimp wants to run scripts from > ~/.gimp-n.n/[plug-ins|scripts]/ > 2) It only works for scripting languages where white space is not > significant. This means you can't use this with python-fu (my preferred > scripting language) > > Am I missing something? Is there an obvious way to do this? While Perl-fu is not ... at it's peak at the moment, from my memory, perl scripts with the GIMP module can be loaded just like any executable script; for example, if I have a script that uses GIMP called myfile.pl and I go to that directory and call ./myfile.pl, it will run. [In fact, this is the only way I've figured out how to run them -- I still haven't figured out how to register a Perl-Fu script in the menus. Heh.] I don't know about Python, but I can imagine it could be possible - although would you need to open the images from Python itself to do so? > If there is no way to do this, would it make a good feature request? *IF* there is no way to do this, I myself don't see anything wrong with the idea... the only thing is I don't know when/if it'd be completed. -- ~Mike - Just my two cents - No man is an island, and no man is unable. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
