Kay Sievers wrote:
> It's 30 now and up to 150 if they are not older than 48 hours.
> We can change the numbers, if you hava a better idea...
Is it really hard to just make it purely time-based (git-rev-list --max-age)?
Think of if Linus is merging with a lot of people and then pushes the results
Ian Campbell wrote:
> I used to subscribe to the kernel RSS feed (using blam) but I found I
> was only getting the most recent 20 commits, which wasn't much good when
> a big batch went in because I would miss some.
Yes, I have that problem too. It appears to be just the way that gitweb
works - l
2 matches
Mail list logo