I noticed that even with v4, we still duplicate a lot of info in the
remaining fields. ce_uid and ce_guid for instance are unlikely to
change ever between entries. So I attempt to store offsets between the
previous entry instead. The result looks good. This is webkit index:
25M index-v2
14M
Hi,
I wonder if someone could help me. I installed git on a Mac and then I copied
the install somewhere else (which I do want to do, trust me). I'm now having
trouble with git svn. I'm getting Can't locate Git/SVN.pm in @INC...
I've added the bin folder to PATH. What else do I need to do? Do
During my day-to-day UGFWIINIT I noticed that we don't do textconv
iteratively. E.g.: I have a file
SuperSecretButDumbFormat.pdf.gpg
and textconv filters with attributes set for *.gpg and *.pdf (using
gpg resp. pdftotext). For Git, the file has only the gpg
attribute, of course. In this case, I
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:48:36 +
James French james.fre...@naturalmotion.com wrote:
I wonder if someone could help me. I installed git on a Mac and then
I copied the install somewhere else (which I do want to do, trust
me). I'm now having trouble with git svn. I'm getting Can't locate
Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
This [1] should help you get started with affecting @INC.
In the particular case of Git, the Makefile hardcodes the path to the
Git library. The script git-svn in Git's exec-path should start with:
use lib (split(/:/, $ENV{GITPERLLIB}
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Khomoutov [mailto:flatw...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: 21 February 2013 10:35
To: James French
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: running git from non-standard location on Mac
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:48:36 +
James French
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Per Cederqvist ced...@opera.com wrote:
Running git branch HEAD may be a stupid thing to do. It actually
was a mistake on my part. Still, I don't think git should dereference
a NULL pointer.
We should not. Can you make a patch to fix it (with test cases)? You
The git branch --list --contains x y command lists
all branches that contains commit x and matches the
pattern y. Reading the git-branch(1) manual page gives
the impression that --list is redundant, and that
you can instead write
git branch --contains x y
That command does something
On 02/21/13 13:50, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Per Cederqvist ced...@opera.com wrote:
Running git branch HEAD may be a stupid thing to do. It actually
was a mistake on my part. Still, I don't think git should dereference
a NULL pointer.
We should not. Can you make a
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Per Cederqvist ced...@opera.com wrote:
Sorry, but isolating the issue reporting it here is about as much time
as I can spend on this issue. Learning the coding standard of Git and
how to write test cases is not something I'm prepared to do, at least
not at the
branch_get() can return NULL (so far on detached HEAD only) but some
code paths in builtin/branch.c cannot deal with that and cause
segfaults. Fix it.
While at there, make sure to bail out when the user gives 2 or more
arguments, but only the first one is processed.
Reported-by: Per Cederqvist
Some time we need to get valid commit without a ref but with proper
tree-ish, now we can't do that.
This patch allow upload-archive's to use reachability checking
rather than checking that is a ref. This means a remote client can
fetch a tip of any valid sha1 or tree-ish.
---
archive.c
Michael Schubert s...@schu.io writes:
On 02/18/2013 06:42 PM, Jeff King wrote:
I will do it again, if people feel strongly about Git being a part of
it. However, I have gotten a little soured on the GSoC experience. Not
because of anything Google has done; it's a good idea, and I think they
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:23:01PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:
* We need an org admin. AFAIK this was done by Peff and Shawn in
tandem last year. Would you do it again?
I will do it
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote:
That command does something completely different,
though. The --contains x part is silently ignored,
so it creates a branch named y pointing at HEAD.
Tested in git 1.8.1.1 and 1.8.1.4.
In my opinion, there are two ways to
On 02/21/13 16:58, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote:
That command does something completely different,
though. The --contains x part is silently ignored,
so it creates a branch named y pointing at HEAD.
Tested in git 1.8.1.1 and 1.8.1.4.
In my
Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net writes:
... but wondering
whether we could and should support concatenating filters by either
- making it easy to request it (say by setting
filter.gpgtopdftotext.textconvpipe to a list of textconv filter names
which are to be applied in sequence)
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
branch_get() can return NULL (so far on detached HEAD only)...
Do you anticipate any other cases where the API call should validly
return NULL? I offhand do not, ...
but some
code paths in builtin/branch.c cannot deal with that and cause
Per Cederqvist ced...@opera.com writes:
On 02/21/13 16:58, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Per Cederqvist wrote:
That command does something completely different,
though. The --contains x part is silently ignored,
so it creates a branch named y pointing at HEAD.
เมื่อกลางดึกวันที่ 13 ก.พ. 56 คนร้ายกว่า 50 คน บุกโจมตีฐานทหารนาวิกโยธินที่
บ้านยือลอ ต.บาเระเหนือ อ.บาเจาะ จ.นราธิวาส มีผู้เสียชีวิต 16 คน เป็นข่าวที่น่า
สะเทือนใจมาก แม้ว่าผู้ที่เสียชีวิตจะเป็นคนร้าย
ถึงยังไงพวกเขาเหล่านั้นล้วนแต่เป็นคน
ไทยด้วยกัน
Junio C Hamano writes:
David Ondřich david.ondr...@aveco.com writes:
I've read [1] recently, there's been some QNX port being
initiated. Does that involve also old versions of QNX 4?
No, I haven't been working on QNX 4 support. I've been targeting QNX 6.3.2,
with a little testing on QNX
Brandon Casey draf...@gmail.com writes:
Teach append_signoff to detect whether a blank line exists at the position
that the signed-off-by line will be added, and refrain from adding an
additional one if one already exists. Or, add an additional line if one
is needed to make sure the new
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ted Zlatanov t...@lifelogs.com wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:58:47 -0500 John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net
wrote:
[snip]
JS Yes, I think it has. Several other applications appear to be using
JS it, including some things considered core in Fedora--which
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:53:07PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Adam Spiers g...@adamspiers.org writes:
OK, thanks for the information. IMHO it would be nice if 'git
format-patch' and 'git am' supported this style of inline patch
inclusion, but
The name of the fields invites a misunderstanding that setting it to
false, saying No, I will not to tell you not to inline, make the
patch inlined in the body of the message, but that is not what it
does. The result is still a MIME attachment as long as
mime_boundary is set. This field only
There is a rare edge case of git-filter-branch: a filter that unsets
identity variables from the environment. Link to git-commit-tree
clarifies how Git would fall back in this situation.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Andrzej Kadłubowski y...@hell.org.pl
---
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 6
filter-branch --env-filter example that shows how to change the email
address in all commits before publishing a project.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Andrzej Kadłubowski y...@hell.org.pl
---
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Brandon Casey draf...@gmail.com wrote:
But, this does not fix the same problem for 'cherry-pick --edit -s'
when used to cherry-pick a commit without a sob.
Correction: when used to cherry-pick a commit with an empty commit message.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Brandon Casey draf...@gmail.com writes:
Teach append_signoff to detect whether a blank line exists at the position
that the signed-off-by line will be added, and refrain from adding an
additional one if one already
Some people may find it convenient to append a simple patch at the
bottom of a discussion e-mail separated by a scissors mark, ready
to be applied with git am -c. Introduce --inline-single option
to format-patch to do so. A typical usage example might be to start
'F'ollow-up to a discussion,
Tadeusz Andrzej Kadłubowski y...@hell.org.pl writes:
There is a rare edge case of git-filter-branch: a filter that unsets
identity variables from the environment. Link to git-commit-tree
clarifies how Git would fall back in this situation.
I find it unclear in the updated text _why_ the
Tadeusz Andrzej Kadłubowski y...@hell.org.pl writes:
filter-branch --env-filter example that shows how to change the email
address in all commits before publishing a project.
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Andrzej Kadłubowski y...@hell.org.pl
---
Assuming that the result formats well both as html
Brandon Casey draf...@gmail.com writes:
Yes. The fix described by John Keeping restores the above behavior
for 'commit -s'. Or the fix I described which inserts two preceding
newlines so it looks like this:
Greetings.
This is my first patch here. Hopefully I get the stylistic political
details right... :)
Patch applies against maint and master
(If I understand the mechanics, in theory a negative offset should work,
if the values lined up just right, but would be very wrong, overwriting the
lower
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:13:32PM -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote:
Greetings.
This is my first patch here. Hopefully I get the stylistic political
details right... :)
Patch applies against maint and master
I have some comments. :)
The body of your email should contain the commit message
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
Unfortunately I am swamped with other work right now so I don't have
time to test the code and might not be able to respond promptly to
feedback.
A note like the above is a good way to give a cue to others so that
we can work together to pick up,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:26:22PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Some people may find it convenient to append a simple patch at the
bottom of a discussion e-mail separated by a scissors mark, ready
to be applied with git am -c. Introduce --inline-single option
to format-patch to do so. A
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:13:32PM -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote:
Greetings.
This is my first patch here. Hopefully I get the stylistic political
details right... :)
Patch applies against maint and master
I have some comments.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:18:40PM -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote:
By having the read and flush size be the same, it's much simpler.
My original bugfix did just read 1024, and write 1024. That works fine
and, yes, is simpler.
I changed it to be more similar to the original code in case there
Joseph Crowell joseph.w.crowell at gmail.com writes:
Use of uninitialized value $u in substitution (s///) at
/usr/local/Cellar/git/1.8.0/lib/Git/SVN.pm
line 106.
Use of uninitialized value $u in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/Cellar/git/1.8.0/lib/Git/SVN.pm line 106.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/t/t7800-difftool.sh b/t/t7800-difftool.sh
index fb00273..21fbba9 100755
--- a/t/t7800-difftool.sh
+++ b/t/t7800-difftool.sh
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ test_expect_success PERL
073678b8e6324a155fa99f40eee0637941a70a34 reworked the
mergetools/ directory so that every file corresponds to a
difftool-supported tool. When this happened the defaults
file went away as it was no longer needed by mergetool--lib.
t7800 tests that configured commands can override builtins,
but
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
@@ -421,6 +443,9 @@ void pp_user_info(const struct pretty_print_context *pp,
if (pp-mailmap)
map_user(pp-mailmap, mailbuf, maillen, namebuf, namelen);
+if (pp-inline_single is_current_user(pp, mailbuf, maillen, namebuf,
namelen))
+
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
@@ -421,6 +443,9 @@ void pp_user_info(const struct pretty_print_context *pp,
if (pp-mailmap)
map_user(pp-mailmap, mailbuf, maillen, namebuf, namelen);
+ if (pp-inline_single is_current_user(pp,
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello,
As far as I understand the documentation, -B of git-log should help
correct rename detection. But it does not seem to work for me.
Let me get a setup:
$ git init .
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/t2/.git/
$ echo 'Lorem ipsum doler sed. Lorem ipsum doler sed. Lorem ipsum doler
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 01:44:00AM +0100, Eckhard Maass wrote:
Let me get a setup:
$ git init .
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/t2/.git/
$ echo 'Lorem ipsum doler sed. Lorem ipsum doler sed. Lorem ipsum doler
sed. Lorem ipsum doler sed.' a
$ git add a
$ git commit -m 'Init.'
From d3fe2c76e6fa53e4cfa6f81600685c21bdadd4e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Entriken github@phor.net
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:10:07 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] submodule update: when using recursion, show full path
Previously when using update with recursion, only the path for the
When git add -u is invoked from a subdirectory it prints a
loud warning message about an upcoming Git 2.0 behavior change.
Some users do not care to be warned. Accomodate them.
The add.silence-pathless-warnings configuration variable can
now be used to silence this warning.
Signed-off-by: David
David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com writes:
When git add -u is invoked from a subdirectory it prints a
loud warning message about an upcoming Git 2.0 behavior change.
Some users do not care to be warned. Accomodate them.
I do not think this is what we discussed to do.
It was very much deliberate
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com writes:
When git add -u is invoked from a subdirectory it prints a
loud warning message about an upcoming Git 2.0 behavior change.
Some users do not care to be warned. Accomodate them.
51 matches
Mail list logo
