, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Eli
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: El
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by:
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by:
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by:
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: El
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: El
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pi
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pi
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia
a previous
observation made here
http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg230236.html
Thanks very much to the people (Matthieu i think)
that will make the reviews, I understand it's boring
--------
Elia Pinto (83):
t5003-archive-
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly ad
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctl
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctl
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
co
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
I am very sorry : the comment is wrong. I will repost shortly.
Best regards
2014-05-15 16:17 GMT+02:00 Elia Pinto :
> Even though POSIX.1 lists -a/-o as options to "test", they are
> marked "Obsolescent XSI". Scripts using these expressions
> should be converted as
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctl
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly ad
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
co
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctl
a = b
but this doesn't
$ test -z "$x" -a a = b
bash: test: too many arguments
because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".
Similarly, if $x is "-f", these
$ test "$x"
$ test "$x" || test c = d
correctly
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
gi
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
chec
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
git-b
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
These patch series convert test -a/-o to && and ||.
This is the second version.
Changes:
- Modified commit comment based on Jonathan Nieder suggestions
(was "don't use the -a or -o option with the test command")
- Modified patch on git-submodule.sh based on Jonathan Ni
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t41
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t5
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t981
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t5
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t0
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t55
The interaction with unary operators and operator precedence
for && and || are better known than -a and -o, and for that
reason we prefer them. Replace all existing instances
of -a and -o to save readers from the burden of thinking
about such things.
---
This is version 2 of the patch to git-submod
2014-05-22 8:49 GMT+02:00 Matthieu Moy :
> Elia Pinto writes:
>
>> This is version 2 of the patch to git-submodule of the
>> patch series "convert test -a/-o to && and ||".
>> It contains the fixes identified by Johannes and
>> Matthieu.
>
&g
Found by check-non-portable-shell.pl
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh |2 +-
git-remote-testgit.sh |2 +-
git-stash.sh |2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900
5-22 14.48, Elia Pinto wrote:
>> Found by check-non-portable-shell.pl
>
> Thanks for picking this up
>> -export TEST_DIRECTORY=$(pwd)/../../../t
>> +TEST_DIRECTORY=$(pwd)/../../../t && export TEST_DIRECTORY
> Minor remark:
> Both commands should go on their o
Found by check-non-portable-shell.pl
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
This is the second version of the patch that includes
Junio suggestions.
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh |3 ++-
git-remote-testgit.sh |3 ++-
git-stash.sh |3 ++-
3 files
This patch makes the code more readable for setting
the refspec variable
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
git-remote-testgit.sh | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-remote-testgit.sh b/git-remote-testgit.sh
index 1c006a0..fb8a003 100755
--- a/git
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
contrib/examples/git-merge.sh |4 ++
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/lib-httpd.sh |2 +-
1 file change
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh |8
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t0025-crlf-auto.sh |6 +++-
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
git-bisect.sh |2 +-
1 file change
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
contrib/examples/git-resolve.sh |2
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t0026-eol-config.sh |8 --
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t5000-tar-tree.sh |2 +-
1 fi
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
git-mergetool.sh |4 ++--
1 file
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t5538-push-shallow.sh |2 +-
1 fi
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
t/t9814-git-p4-rename.sh |4 ++
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
contrib/examples/git-repack.sh |4 ++
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test && test " spawning
one extra process by using a single "test -a " no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto
---
401 - 500 of 552 matches
Mail list logo
