Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, Junio has been talking about adding commit hooks. I don't think
> that's been done.
No, notyet. But tonight.
> The only question is what the hook/trigger should look like. just put
> something like
>
> [ -x .git/hooks/applypatch-hook ] &&
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I prefer to add it myself rather than to have it added automatically -
> but mayve thats you me being a bit mistrusting.
>
> The only git- command I use today is git-applymbox.
If you did not have that "add it myself" preference, I would
have recommended
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> I almost always handedit my mails and I find myself forgetting to add
> "Signed-off-by" from time to time.
> Is there a simple way to implment a trigger that can check that _I_
> signed off the patch before applying it?
Well, Junio has been talking a
> (Also, with proper "Signed-off-by:" lines it's also always clear that
> there were other people involved, and that the author of the patch is
> different from the person who applied it).
I almost always handedit my mails and I find myself forgetting to add
"Signed-off-by" from time to time.
Is
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>> 1) Fix applymbox such that it understands RFC822-valid Subject lines
>> which wrap across multiple text lines.
>
> It already should do this.
>
>> 2) Teach it to understand MIME, and not treat the MIME hea
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > 2) Teach it to understand MIME, and not treat the MIME headers like part
> > of the message.
>
> [...]
>
> Ergo: if somebody sends you mime-encoded patches, hit them with a baseball
> bat (polite
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The fact is, anybody who doesn't edit the emails that come in is BROKEN.
> There are two kinds of emails:
>
> - the nicely formatted ones where the author follows all the rules
>
>This kind of email doesn't need MIME decoding anyway.
That depends
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> 1) Fix applymbox such that it understands RFC822-valid Subject lines
> which wrap across multiple text lines.
It already should do this.
> 2) Teach it to understand MIME, and not treat the MIME headers like part
> of the message.
But this one I re
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Fix applymbox such that it understands RFC822-valid Subject lines
> which wrap across multiple text lines.
I thought I did this in mailinfo (read_one_header() function)
some time ago. I'd appreciate it if you could point me at a
sample message that f
If someone is thus motivated, I have two requests in this area:
1) Fix applymbox such that it understands RFC822-valid Subject lines
which wrap across multiple text lines.
2) Teach it to understand MIME, and not treat the MIME headers like part
of the message.
-
To unsubscribe from this l
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> This is a companion patch to the previous format-patch fix.
> With "-k", format-patch can be told not to remove the [PATCH] in
> the original commit, nor to add the [PATCH] on its own.
I think this might be the point in time to just make the "[PATCH
This is a companion patch to the previous format-patch fix.
With "-k", format-patch can be told not to remove the [PATCH] in
the original commit, nor to add the [PATCH] on its own.
However, applymbox toolchain has a code to remove [PATCH] (among
other things) from the Subject: line, which is the r
12 matches
Mail list logo
