From: "Torsten Bögershausen"
On 2014-06-13 03.18, David Turner wrote:
[]
It is too old for my patch because it doesn't support ifunc (and I
suspect that no version of GCC for Windows supports ifunc). But that
does not seem to be what is going on in your error message. Instead,
when we #inclu
On 2014-06-13 03.18, David Turner wrote:
[]
>
> It is too old for my patch because it doesn't support ifunc (and I
> suspect that no version of GCC for Windows supports ifunc). But that
> does not seem to be what is going on in your error message. Instead,
> when we #include , we get compat/cpui
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 08:04 +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 6/10/2014 1:05, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > Junio C Hamano writes:
> >
> >> David Turner writes:
> >>
> >>> Since Junio has picked up the first patch from previous versions of
> >>> this series, I'm just going to send the second (SSE)
Johannes Sixt writes:
> And I get this when I compile on Windows with msysgit:
>
> CC abspath.o
> In file included from git-compat-util.h:694,
> from cache.h:4,
> from abspath.c:1:
> compat/cpuid.h: In function 'processor_supports_sse42':
> compat/cpuid.h:11:
Am 6/10/2014 1:05, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> David Turner writes:
>>
>>> Since Junio has picked up the first patch from previous versions of
>>> this series, I'm just going to send the second (SSE) one. I decided
>>> not to s/NO_SSE42/!HAVE_SSE42/ because it looks li
Junio C Hamano writes:
> David Turner writes:
>
>> Since Junio has picked up the first patch from previous versions of
>> this series, I'm just going to send the second (SSE) one. I decided
>> not to s/NO_SSE42/!HAVE_SSE42/ because it looks like git mostly uses
>> the former convention (for ins
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 15:16 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > Since Junio has picked up the first patch from previous versions of
> > this series, I'm just going to send the second (SSE) one. I decided
> > not to s/NO_SSE42/!HAVE_SSE42/ because it looks like git mostly us
David Turner writes:
> Since Junio has picked up the first patch from previous versions of
> this series, I'm just going to send the second (SSE) one. I decided
> not to s/NO_SSE42/!HAVE_SSE42/ because it looks like git mostly uses
> the former convention (for instance, that's what GIT_PARSE_WIT
Since Junio has picked up the first patch from previous versions of
this series, I'm just going to send the second (SSE) one. I decided
not to s/NO_SSE42/!HAVE_SSE42/ because it looks like git mostly uses
the former convention (for instance, that's what GIT_PARSE_WITH
generates).
Thanks for all o
9 matches
Mail list logo
