On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> Why Lua? I don't especially like it as a language. But it's designed for
> this purpose, which makes it very lightweight and relatively simple to
> embed.
Another option is tcl. String-based approach feels more natural for
pretty.c and shell use
Matthieu Moy writes:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> We've talked off and on about extending the --pretty=format specifiers
>> to something more flexible. There's also been talk recently of more
>> flexible commit-filtering (e.g., grepping individual notes).
>
> Mercurial has a similar thing, which can
Jeff King writes:
> We've talked off and on about extending the --pretty=format specifiers
> to something more flexible. There's also been talk recently of more
> flexible commit-filtering (e.g., grepping individual notes).
Mercurial has a similar thing, which can be a source of inspiration:
ht
- Original Message -
> From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:22:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] git log --pretty=lua
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> > We've talked off and on about extending t
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> We've talked off and on about extending the --pretty=format specifiers
> to something more flexible. There's also been talk recently of more
> flexible commit-filtering (e.g., grepping individual notes). Rather
> than invent a new Turing-complet
We've talked off and on about extending the --pretty=format specifiers
to something more flexible. There's also been talk recently of more
flexible commit-filtering (e.g., grepping individual notes). Rather
than invent a new Turing-complete language, I thought I'd try building
on somebody else's w
6 matches
Mail list logo
