Theodore Ts'o writes:
> Over the past 5+ years, I've observed that I
> think the way commit selection in "git format-patch" is inconsistent
> with how we handle commit selection for other commands, e.g., "git log
> " vs and "git format-patch ". Even if you think that
> this is a matter of self-i
he fallocate NO_HIDE_STALE flag is a good example of that; it's used
> in production on thousands and thousands of servers by Google and Tao
> Bao, but since there was strong opposition on the ext4 list, we've
> kept it as an out-of-tree patch. Note what I did not do. I did no
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:41:41AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > And I hazard to guess that the vast majority agree with Junio on this
> > (based,
> > again, on email evidence). Not with you.
>
> That is irrelevant, and a fallacy. The vast majority of people thought the
> Earth was the cente
Max Horn wrote:
> I guess most other people keep out of this because they are sensible enough
> to not feed the troll, and instead focus on useful things. But I can't help
> it, I have to say this.
You should probably read the definition of troll:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
U
I guess most other people keep out of this because they are sensible enough to
not feed the troll, and instead focus on useful things. But I can't help it, I
have to say this.
On 17.10.2013, at 23:44, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
>>> Junio C
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Such a review comment and the discussion that follows it after a
> >> patch is posted is an essential part of the collaborative
> >> development process in this community and it has helped the quality
> >> of our en
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Such a review comment and the discussion that follows it after a
>> patch is posted is an essential part of the collaborative
>> development process in this community and it has helped the quality
>> of our end product. We unfortunately saw time
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > Clearly, a lot of my patches have not been reviewed ...
>
> I think the reason for it most likely is because you earned the Bozo
> bit ($gmane/227602) in many reviewers' eyes.
So what you are saying is that the r
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Clearly, a lot of my patches have not been reviewed ...
I think the reason for it most likely is because you earned the Bozo
bit ($gmane/227602) in many reviewers' eyes.
I phrased it differently ($gmane/233347) at the beginning of this
cycle, but I'll sa
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Felipe Contreras"
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 8:24 AM
>> Clearly, a lot of my patches have not been reviewed properly, so even
>> though they are technically correct, and would benefit users, so
From: "Felipe Contreras"
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 8:24 AM
Hi,
Clearly, a lot of my patches have not been reviewed properly, so even
though they are technically correct, and would benefit users, some
have
specifically been requested by them, and at least one would
sig
Hi,
Clearly, a lot of my patches have not been reviewed properly, so even
though they are technically correct, and would benefit users, some have
specifically been requested by them, and at least one would
significantly improve Git's user interface... they are going nowhere.
Here is the su
12 matches
Mail list logo
