Here's a rather hackish implementation of the write side. Any
thoughts on the format? (Obviously the implementation needs work.
For example, it needs to be optional.
Thoughts so far:
- I want to put the value of prefix into an extended header.
- Should blobs have their sha1 hashes in an
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
On 01/09/2014 09:11 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
to verify that
On 01/09/2014 09:11 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
to verify that the archive is a correct copy of a given
On 09.01.2014 04:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
to verify that the archive is a correct copy of a given commit. Would
this be considered a useful feature?
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
to verify that the archive is a correct copy of a given commit. Would
this be considered a useful feature?
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
to verify that the archive is a
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
You only need the object name of the top-level tree. After untar
the archive into an empty directory, make it a new repository and
git add . git write-tree---the result should match the
top-level tree the archive was supposed to contain.
Hmm. I
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
You only need the object name of the top-level tree. After untar
the archive into an empty directory, make it a new repository and
git add . git write-tree---the result should
It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
to verify that the archive is a correct copy of a given commit. Would
this be considered a useful feature?
Presumably there would be a 'git untar' command
9 matches
Mail list logo
