On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Jirong Hu jirong...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a quick look at Stash. Do we really need this? This looks like
a GIT add-on, as it said, GIT repo management tool. It's not GIT,
right?
AFAIK, there's no proprietary/commertial (re-)implementation of Git.
And
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 7:40:16 PM UTC+1, Jirong Hu wrote:
I took a quick look at Stash. Do we really need this? This looks like a
GIT add-on, as it said, GIT repo management tool. It's not GIT, right?
*coff* here's an interview with the lead developer of Stash (audio-only):
I have a directory ./MAIN/ with /A/ and /B/ under MAIN
./MAIN/
./MAIN/A/
./MAIN/B/
A and B have their own repos ... i want to combine them so i have a repo
under MAIN, while keeping the history of A and B ... how can i do this? i
use sourcetree if any specific help using sourcetree is
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:12:26 AM UTC+1, HWSWMAN wrote:
I have a directory ./MAIN/ with /A/ and /B/ under MAIN
./MAIN/
./MAIN/A/
./MAIN/B/
A and B have their own repos ... i want to combine them so i have a repo
under MAIN, while keeping the history of A and B ... how can i do
thank you i will read the doc
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:12:26 AM UTC+1, HWSWMAN wrote:
I have a directory ./MAIN/ with /A/ and /B/ under MAIN
./MAIN/
./MAIN/A/
./MAIN/B/
A and B have their own repos
the purpose for me is, i no longer want to commit in A or B only Main but i
want the old history to survive for those ... it looks like if i do this, A
and B will still be indepwndant repos, which is ok, but say i make anchange
to A or B , will i see the change in main and can i commit it to main,
