Hi Konrád (The original enquirer?),
From: "Paul Smith"
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 01:23 -0700, Konrád Lőrinczi wrote:
I should somehow ignore atime and mtime when doing diff for status.
Just to be clear, what this would involve is for every file in the
repo,
Git would have to extract the HEAD ver
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 06:43 -0700, dexter ietf wrote:
> git clone with --bare option was significantly faster, so
>
> i just assumed it fetches the bare-minimum data.
> thanks for your detailed answer, it all makes sense now.
The difference in time tells you how long it takes to extract a worki
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 01:23 -0700, Konrád Lőrinczi wrote:
> I should somehow ignore atime and mtime when doing diff for status.
Just to be clear, what this would involve is for every file in the repo,
Git would have to extract the HEAD version into a temporary file (or
memory buffer) then compare
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
dexter ietf wrote:
> i have a bare repo, when i do a git fetch, the remote tags are not
> getting updated, though the 'fetch command' runs successfully. please
> shed some light. thanks.
That's almost zero information in your problem statement.
So, to be
Hi,
i have a bare repo, when i do a git fetch, the remote tags are not getting
updated, though the 'fetch command' runs successfully. please shed
some light. thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from th
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 5:58:21 PM UTC+5:30, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
> dexter ietf > wrote:
>
> > bare repository only contains the meta data, but when i clone from a
>
>
git clone with --bare option was significantly faster, so
i just a
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
dexter ietf wrote:
> bare repository only contains the meta data, but when i clone from a
> bare-repo
> full tree will be checked out. how does git manage to achieve that. i
> know it's
> a newbie question. but surprised by the fact that git can do that.
Hi, This is what i did,
git main repo, call it (M):
- clone (M) call it (M-merge)
- clone (M) call it (C-merge)
- on C-merge, add a new remote for (M-merge), call it Remote-M
- on C-merge, create a branch called SC-merge and set it track Remote-M
- make a commit to SC-merge and try to push
I tried:
$ git update-index --refresh
$ git status
On branch feature/file_restore_date
nothing to commit, working directory clean
$ git update-index --really-refresh
$ git status
On branch feature/file_restore_date
nothing to commit, working directory clean
Unfortunately none of them was able
Does 'git update-index' offer any opportunies? (I've not RTFM'd it)
- Original Message -
From: Konrád Lőrinczi
To: Git for human beings
Cc: flatw...@users.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [git-users] Git doesn't detect change, if file modifi
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 4:03:46 PM UTC+5:30, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
> dexter ietf > wrote:
>
> I'm afraid you might have terminological issues here: you can't clone
> branches, you can only clone entire repositories (containing branches).
Hi,
bare repository only contains the meta data, but when i clone from a
bare-repo
full tree will be checked out. how does git manage to achieve that. i know
it's
a newbie question. but surprised by the fact that git can do that. so
curious to
know the answer asap. thanks.
-dexter
--
You rec
I am using git to manage some circuit components.
Each component is small and I plan to create a "component" project in Git
to hold all the small components.
Each component may have several released version, such as Comonent1_V1,
Component1_V2, Comonent2_V1, Component2_V2.
And for future reuse, I
I tried to set core to:
trustctime = false
checkStat = minimal
Unfortunately the change is still not detected :(
It seems isn't a way to force fallback to file checking and completely
ignore file modification date :(
2015. július 22., szerda 21:10:56 UTC+2 időpontban Konstantin Khomoutov
14 matches
Mail list logo
