--
Hi experts
I always see something like
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/54774
Then it follows patches, I don't know how to get the first one, which
is not code changes but some info like changes since vx, and then
list the
modified files
I also see
Hi,
I want to know what is the file where, Git portable or Git stand alone
software, store the mapping between the clone repository ( on pc ) and the
web repository.
I need this information because I know that clone repository could have a
different name compared to web repository.
Thanks for
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:37:25 PM UTC+1, Floriano Fauzzi wrote:
Hi,
I want to know what is the file where, Git portable or Git stand alone
software, store the mapping between the clone repository ( on pc ) and the
web repository.
I need this information because I know that clone
Hi Thomas,
thanks for the answer. I'm sorry, I didnt explain my question clearly. I
try to clarify it by this scenario:
Paul has a repository on GitHub called *rep1 *with some files. On his pc,
Paul clones it into the local repo called *rep2 *and stored, say, in C:\
Now the question is:
How
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:30:04 +0800
lei yang yanglei.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I always see something like
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/54774
Looks like the result of `git format-patch` with the --cover-letter
command-line argument used.
--
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Floriano Fauzzi fauzzi.flori...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to know what is the file where, Git portable or Git stand
alone software, store the mapping between the clone repository
( on pc ) and the web repository.
I need this information because I
Konstantin gave you a good answer. But I'll put in one from my newbie self.
When you create a new repo, and you use a git clone command. That
automatically sets up a remote called origin with a URL which is
where you cloned from. E.g.
I did:
git clone https://github.com/git/git
and in the git
On 01/15/13 00:25, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:24:34 AM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote:
However, when I try git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree outside my
repo, I get
fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /home)
Stopping at filesystem boundary
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:30:04 +0800
lei yang yanglei.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I always see something like
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/54774
Looks like the
Hello,
I am running Git 1.7.11-preview 20120710 (take from the msysgit Google Code
site) on Windows Server 2008 R2. We performed a standard 32bit fresh
installation and Git seems to run fine for a few days.
After a few days though, the installation seems to go sour. After launching
a Command
On Friday, January 11, 2013 5:41:39 PM UTC-5, Dale Worley wrote:
Half of your problem is clear: When you check in a file, the
version that gets into the repository is processed as you've arranged for
it
to be. But of course, that doesn't change the file in the working
copy, because
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:17:50 -0800 (PST)
Russell im.russell.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
That way your repository always keeps normalized blobs.
I agree that this is exactly what I would do to mimic RCS behaviour.
But I am deliberately trying not to for the reason described below:
Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 13:32:10 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen:
Could it be that Apache (or whatever webserver you use) is not correctly
configured? Please post the details of your environment along with the
Apache configuration.
I don't think so, I have used the
Hi again,
Am 11.01.2013 11:38, schrieb Carsten Fuchs:
[...]
So my real question is, why does Git not do something analogous?
(Afaics, update the HEAD, update the Index, but leave the working-copy edition
alone?)
I searched for this beforehand, and most advice involves either stashing, or
I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get the
following message:
Updating 527f1ee..18cf73e
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge:
java//Info.java
Please, commit your changes or stash them before you can merge.
Try to do a git fetch and post the result of the commands git status and
git diff --stat master origin/master
William Seiti Mizuta
@williammizuta
Desenvolvedor da Caelum
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, JavaSrvcs jvsr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not changed any code and just tried to do a
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:07:54PM -0800, JavaSrvcs wrote:
I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get the
following message:
Updating 527f1ee..18cf73e
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge:
java//Info.java
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:07:54 AM UTC+1, JavaSrvcs wrote:
I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get the
following message:
Updating 527f1ee..18cf73e
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:48:33 PM UTC+1, Carsten wrote:
Hi again,
Am 11.01.2013 11:38, schrieb Carsten Fuchs:
[...]
So my real question is, why does Git not do something analogous?
(Afaics, update the HEAD, update the Index, but leave the working-copy
edition alone?)
I
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:57:19 PM UTC+1, Bart Baker wrote:
Hello,
I am running Git 1.7.11-preview 20120710 (take from the msysgit Google
Code
site) on Windows Server 2008 R2. We performed a standard 32bit fresh
installation and Git seems to run fine for a few days.
After a few
21 matches
Mail list logo
