On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:57:19 PM UTC+1, Bart Baker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running Git 1.7.11-preview 20120710 (take from the msysgit Google
> Code
> site) on Windows Server 2008 R2. We performed a standard 32bit fresh
> installation and Git seems to run fine for a few days.
>
> After
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:48:33 PM UTC+1, Carsten wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Am 11.01.2013 11:38, schrieb Carsten Fuchs:
> > [...]
> > So my real question is, why does Git not do something analogous?
> > (Afaics, update the HEAD, update the Index, but leave the working-copy
> edition alone?
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:07:54 AM UTC+1, JavaSrvcs wrote:
> I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get the
> following message:
>
> Updating 527f1ee..18cf73e
> error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
> merge:
> java//I
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:07:54PM -0800, JavaSrvcs wrote:
> I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get the
> following message:
>
> Updating 527f1ee..18cf73e
> error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
> merge:
> java//Info.ja
Try to do a git fetch and post the result of the commands git status and
git diff --stat master origin/master
William Seiti Mizuta
@williammizuta
Desenvolvedor da Caelum
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, JavaSrvcs wrote:
> I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get th
I have not changed any code and just tried to do a git pull and get the
following message:
Updating 527f1ee..18cf73e
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge:
java//Info.java
Please, commit your changes or stash them before you can merge.
Abortin
Hi again,
Am 11.01.2013 11:38, schrieb Carsten Fuchs:
[...]
So my real question is, why does Git not do something analogous?
(Afaics, update the HEAD, update the Index, but leave the working-copy edition
alone?)
I searched for this beforehand, and most advice involves either stashing, or wit
Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 13:32:10 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen:
>
> Could it be that Apache (or whatever webserver you use) is not correctly
> configured? Please post the details of your environment along with the
> Apache configuration.
>
I don't think so, I have used the descri
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:17:50 -0800 (PST)
Russell wrote:
[...]
> > That way your repository always keeps "normalized" blobs.
>
> I agree that this is exactly what I would do to mimic RCS behaviour.
> But I am deliberately trying not to for the reason described below:
>
> Unfortunately using th
On Friday, January 11, 2013 5:41:39 PM UTC-5, Dale Worley wrote:
>
>
> Half of your problem is clear: When you check in a file, the
> version that gets into the repository is processed as you've arranged for
> it
> to be. But of course, that doesn't change the file in the working
> copy, be
On Friday, January 11, 2013 5:41:57 PM UTC-5, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
>
> You seem to misunderstand the concept a bit.
> The blobs kept in the repo should have some neutral placeholder, such as
> to read something like "Last modified $Timestamp$" in them.
>
> Then, in the smudge filter, wh
Hello,
I am running Git 1.7.11-preview 20120710 (take from the msysgit Google Code
site) on Windows Server 2008 R2. We performed a standard 32bit fresh
installation and Git seems to run fine for a few days.
After a few days though, the installation seems to go sour. After launching
a Command Prom
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:30:04 +0800
> lei yang wrote:
>
>> I always see something like
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/54774
>
> Looks like the result of `git format-patch` with the "--cover-
On 01/15/13 00:25, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:24:34 AM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote:
However, when I try "git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree" outside my
repo, I get
fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /home)
Stopping at filesystem boundary
Konstantin gave you a good answer. But I'll put in one from my newbie self.
When you create a new repo, and you use a "git clone" command. That
automatically sets up a remote called "origin" with a URL which is
where you cloned from. E.g.
I did:
git clone https://github.com/git/git
and in the g
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Floriano Fauzzi wrote:
> >> I want to know what is the file where, Git portable or Git stand
> >> alone software, store the mapping between the clone repository
> >> ( on pc ) and the web repository.
> >> I need this information because I know that clone r
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:30:04 +0800
lei yang wrote:
> I always see something like
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/54774
Looks like the result of `git format-patch` with the "--cover-letter"
command-line argument used.
--
Hi Thomas,
thanks for the answer. I'm sorry, I didnt explain my question clearly. I
try to clarify it by this scenario:
"Paul has a repository on GitHub called *rep1 *with some files. On his pc,
Paul clones it into the local repo called *rep2 *and stored, say, in C:\ "
Now the question is:
How d
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:37:25 PM UTC+1, Floriano Fauzzi wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to know what is the file where, Git portable or Git stand alone
> software, store the mapping between the clone repository ( on pc ) and the
> web repository.
> I need this information because I know that clone
Hi,
I want to know what is the file where, Git portable or Git stand alone
software, store the mapping between the clone repository ( on pc ) and the
web repository.
I need this information because I know that clone repository could have a
different name compared to web repository.
Thanks for th
Hi experts
I always see something like
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/54774
Then it follows patches, I don't know how to get the first one, which
is not code changes but some info like "changes since vx", and then
list the
modified files
I also see somet
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
