Re: [git-users] git-filter-branch : How to filter all commits from an given commit ?

2014-10-24 Thread Dale R. Worley
> From: Alcolo Alcolo > Because C can be a base commit of branches and merges, then it's a > nightmare to rebase. > > I know that scripts exists to rebase merges (based on git-rev-list, > git-cat-file, git-hash-object/git-commit-tree), but those scripts redo the > git-filter-branch job. Actu

Re: [git-users] Git objects and user permissions

2014-10-24 Thread Jon Zeolla
Nevermind I guess the sticky bit trickles down throughout the whole directory structure. On Friday, October 24, 2014 2:31:15 PM UTC-4, Jon Zeolla wrote: > > My concern with commit-only permission restrictions are that I would need > to allow the ability for everyone who can push to directl

Re: [git-users] Git objects and user permissions

2014-10-24 Thread Jon Zeolla
My concern with commit-only permission restrictions are that I would need to allow the ability for everyone who can push to directly edit /etc/files/environments/{production,development}/*, which could break a lot of things in this environment. What are your thoughts on adding the sticky bit

Re: [git-users] git-filter-branch : How to filter all commits from an given commit ?

2014-10-24 Thread Alcolo Alcolo
Because C can be a base commit of branches and merges, then it's a nightmare to rebase. I know that scripts exists to rebase merges (based on git-rev-list, git-cat-file, git-hash-object/git-commit-tree), but those scripts redo the git-filter-branch job. Honestly, I'm not really capable of dea

Re: [git-users] Git objects and user permissions

2014-10-24 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:30:09PM -0700, Jon Zeolla wrote: > Hi Konstantin, > > I apologize - it appears that all of the objects in this directory > are owned by the individual who pushes them, but it seemed like an > anomaly because my file permissions script overwrote all of the > older file pe