On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:48:33 PM UTC+1, Carsten wrote:
>
>> My guess is that it has just always behaved that way, and changing it now
> would surprise too many users. Personally I would find it very disturbing
> if "merge" started modifying my index (the only commands that should modify
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:48:33 PM UTC+1, Carsten wrote:
>
>
> Hi again,
>
> Am 11.01.2013 11:38, schrieb Carsten Fuchs:
> > [...]
> > So my real question is, why does Git not do something analogous?
> > (Afaics, update the HEAD, update the Index, but leave the working-copy
> edition al
Wasnt there something like patch-id you can use in this case?
Is there a way to search a branch for a commit with a certain patch id?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving email
On Monday, March 18, 2013 4:40:55 PM UTC+1, lei yang wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Johan 't Hart
> > wrote:
>
>> Wasnt there something like patch-id you can use in this case?
>>
>
>
>
> Is there a way to search a branch for a
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:48:59 PM UTC+1, Brian Jones wrote:
>
> In out of the box git, do commits remember the name of the branch that
> created them? If so, what command can I use to see that information? My
> assumption is that commits do not record branch names but I want
> confirmatio
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:34:18 PM UTC+1, Ashutosh Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on removing big file from my git repo and its history as
> well. But i am facing one issue ..
>
> here is my scenario
>
> 1. Create a repo
> 2. Commit and push a big file
> 3. Clone the repo in to test_
Another way you might have a chance of getting rid of the big file:
- Do a filter-branch (to get rid of big file)
- Create a helper branch
- Reset it to the place where the big file was first committed (I mean, not
before that commit, but right on it)
- Now create a dummy empty file with the same
For me its not really clear whether your developers work on a project and
do changes on the SDK from the chip guys, or the project is purely
(extensive) modifications to the SDK?
In both cases, I think you can do both the options you proposed like this:
Create a git repository that has 2 submodu
On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 8:42:28 PM UTC+2, Dale Worley wrote:
>
> Those look way too heavy-weight for me. I just need a tool that keeps
> track of the deltas to files that are due to my intervention vs. the
> deltas to the files that are due to the distributed version of the
> software.
>
>
You did
git cherry-pick HEAD..A
Instead of
git cherry-pick A
?
Or maybe the wrongly introduced code is around the conflict you resolved?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving e
10 matches
Mail list logo
