Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-05 Thread Dale R. Worley
> From: Konstantin Khomoutov > > Subversion has/had its share of warts, too. You're right, of course, but the "warts" you are describing are *lack of features*, whereas Tristan's complaint is *inconsistent and complex user interface*. Those two issues are different, and there are conflicts in f

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-04 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:02:58PM -0500, Dale R. Worley wrote: > > From: Tristan Stanic > > > > What is the reason the git developers use obscure syntax? This make the git > > learning curve uselessly complex. > > My belief is that the system grew over time, with many people using it > well be

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-03 Thread Dale R. Worley
> From: Tristan Stanic > > What is the reason the git developers use obscure syntax? This make the git > learning curve uselessly complex. My belief is that the system grew over time, with many people using it well before it reached the current state. Thus, whatever syntax was first establishe

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-03 Thread Les Nightingill
well, yes of course, I agree, if there's a friendly UI like a light switch, then there's no compelling reason to understand electricity. But if you have to use pliers and screwdrivers to turn on the lights it's good to understand the basics of electrical circuits. On Feb 2, 2013, at 10:39 PM, T

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-03 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Malusi Gcakasi" Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 10:09 AM On 2/3/2013 8:02 AM, Les Nightingill wrote: It will help you a lot with the syntax to really understand the architecture and the data model. I'm also pretty new to using git, can you recommend any good books/blogs/articles for l

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-03 Thread Philip Oakley
n be done and dusted, even if someone else's context changes. See Dilbert... - Original Message - From: Tristan Stanic To: git-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 6:39 AM Subject: Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax You can ask anyone to tur

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-03 Thread Malusi Gcakasi
On 2/3/2013 8:02 AM, Les Nightingill wrote: It will help you a lot with the syntax to really understand the architecture and the data model. I'm also pretty new to using git, can you recommend any good books/blogs/articles for learning about the architecture and data model? -- Kind Regards M

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-02 Thread Tristan Stanic
You can ask anyone to turn on the light by just saying "Turn the light on", you will get the job done much faster than if you give a lecture about electricity and light bulb technology. Although understanding the underlying physics would make a lot of good, the simple and direct solution is mor

Re: [git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-02 Thread Les Nightingill
I think every one of us has asked this same question at some point early in our work with git. There have been many attempts to sweeten the syntax with sugar. But mostly we struggle through the abominable syntax and love git for it's great power and flexibility. It will help you a lot with the

[git-users] A plead for more meaningful syntax

2013-02-02 Thread Tristan Stanic
Hi, I am learning Git at the moment. Very novice level. Just learn from this thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4850717/how-to-cancel-a-local-git-commit That to cancel the last local commit, you must type: *git reset --soft HEAD^ *. I would think that s simple syntax like: *git undo-comm