[git-users] Re: git const branch

2009-11-27 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Nov 27, 10:25 pm, Rick DeNatale wrote: >>> The concept for a fixed pointer to a commit is called a tag. If I >>> want to mark a point I might want to get back to, such as the commit >>> corresponding to a current release, the I tag it and push the tag. >> Good point, but there's one exception

Re: [git-users] Re: git const branch

2009-11-27 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Nov 27, 9:51 pm, Rick DeNatale wrote: > Some branches in git are tracking another branches (for example, usually master tracks origin/master). Let's assume, that in my work- flow i don't want accidentally commit in m

[git-users] Re: git const branch

2009-11-27 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Nov 27, 9:51 pm, Rick DeNatale wrote: >>> Some branches in git are tracking another branches (for example, >>> usually master tracks origin/master). Let's assume, that in my work- >>> flow i don't want accidentally commit in master, but i want master to >>> track origin/master. I release that

Re: [git-users] Re: git const branch

2009-11-27 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Nov 26, 11:23 am, itroot wrote: > >> Some branches in git are tracking another branches (for example, >> usually master tracks origin/master). Let's assume, that in my work- >> flow i don't want accidentally commit in master, but i

[git-users] Re: git const branch

2009-11-27 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Nov 26, 11:23 am, itroot wrote: > Some branches in git are tracking another branches (for example, > usually master tracks origin/master). Let's assume, that in my work- > flow i don't want accidentally commit in master, but i want master to > track origin/master. I release that i can do this