Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-10 Thread Alexander Zorgiev
SRY: The question is in fact not to let people to perform these steps manually. вторник, 10 июня 2014 г., 14:09:57 UTC+3 пользователь Alexander Zorgiev написал: > > The question is in fact not to let people not to perform these steps > manually. > > вторник, 3 июня 2014 г., 15:32:26 UTC+3 польз

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-10 Thread Alexander Zorgiev
It seems there is no comfortable platform-independed way to do this. Maybe feature request? вторник, 3 июня 2014 г., 15:34:12 UTC+3 пользователь John McKown написал: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Magnus Therning > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:24:43AM -0700, Pierre-François CLEMEN

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-10 Thread Alexander Zorgiev
Post-merge hook? Anyways someone needs to set up this post-merge hook in a manual fashion. вторник, 3 июня 2014 г., 15:34:12 UTC+3 пользователь John McKown написал: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Magnus Therning > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:24:43AM -0700, Pierre-François CLEMENT

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-10 Thread Alexander Zorgiev
The question is in fact not to let people not to perform these steps manually. вторник, 3 июня 2014 г., 15:32:26 UTC+3 пользователь Pierre-François CLEMENT написал: > > Sounds good enough. You could probably even embed it into a Makefile or a > Gruntfile or whatever-file you're using if you alr

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-10 Thread Alexander Zorgiev
Symlinks has nothing to do with the fact that I want the part of the configuration to be versioned. BTW on windows symlinks work kinda differently. Of course since Vista/Server 2008 we have mklink bundled, but I don't think msys.win will handle this situation correctly. Nevertheless the fact th

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-03 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 07:34:10AM -0500, John McKown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:24:43AM -0700, Pierre-François CLEMENT wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I want to extend git commands set on per-repository basis and > > therefore I >

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-03 Thread John McKown
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:24:43AM -0700, Pierre-François CLEMENT wrote: > > > > > > > I want to extend git commands set on per-repository basis and > therefore I > > > need to have VERSIONED sort of .config file > > > > > > > You can use t

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-03 Thread Pierre-François CLEMENT
Sounds good enough. You could probably even embed it into a Makefile or a Gruntfile or whatever-file you're using if you already have one. And about the two-steps thing, you might want to get them to use a post-merge hook to automate it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [git-users] Re: git repository versioned .config file?

2014-06-03 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:24:43AM -0700, Pierre-François CLEMENT wrote: > > > > I want to extend git commands set on per-repository basis and therefore I > > need to have VERSIONED sort of .config file > > > > You can use the repository's .git/config file to set repo-specific > configuration,