On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 8/31/2013 21:27, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>> Am 8/30/2013 8:32, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
If you have a history where
- branches "master" and "maint" point at commit
Am 8/31/2013 21:27, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> Am 8/30/2013 8:32, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> If you have a history where
>>>
>>> - branches "master" and "maint" point at commit A;
>>> - branch "next" points at commit B that is a descenda
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 8/30/2013 8:32, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> If you have a history where
>>
>> - branches "master" and "maint" point at commit A;
>> - branch "next" points at commit B that is a descendant of A; and
>> - there are tags X and Y pointing at
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Which means that the approach taken by the patch to only allow
> exclusion of negative ones makes the idea only 50% useful compared
> to its potential. And I suspect that "we can start from 50% which
> is better than 0% and later fill the
Felipe Contreras writes:
>>> If you do 'master ^maint --except master', handle_commit will return
>>> three commits:
>>
>> Would the same argument apply to
>>
>> next ^maint --except maint
>>
>> where next gets in the queue, maint in tainted, and skipped?
>
> maint is not skipped, as it's not t
Am 8/30/2013 9:32, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> On Aug 30, 2013 12:19 AM, "Felipe Contreras"
>> Would the same argument apply to
>>
>> next ^maint --except maint
>>
>> where next gets in the queue, maint in tainted, and skipped?
>
> main
Am 8/30/2013 8:32, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> If you have a history where
>
> - branches "master" and "maint" point at commit A;
> - branch "next" points at commit B that is a descendant of A; and
> - there are tags X and Y pointing at commits that are ahead of B
>or behind A
>
> i.e.
>
>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pardon terseness, typo and HTML from a tablet.
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2013 12:19 AM, "Felipe Contreras"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > Felipe Contreras writes:
>> >
>> >> So that it's possible to remo
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 8/30/2013 7:00, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> So that it's possible to remove certain refs from the list without
>> removing the objects that are referenced by other refs.
>>
>> For example this repository:
>>
>> * 374e8dd (crap) crap
>>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> So that it's possible to remove certain refs from the list without
>> removing the objects that are referenced by other refs.
>>
>> For example this repository:
>>
>> * 374e8dd (crap) crap
>> * 4cbbf7b (tes
Am 8/30/2013 7:00, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
> So that it's possible to remove certain refs from the list without
> removing the objects that are referenced by other refs.
>
> For example this repository:
>
> * 374e8dd (crap) crap
> * 4cbbf7b (test) two
> * d025ae0 (HEAD, master) one
>
> W
Felipe Contreras writes:
> So that it's possible to remove certain refs from the list without
> removing the objects that are referenced by other refs.
>
> For example this repository:
>
> * 374e8dd (crap) crap
> * 4cbbf7b (test) two
> * d025ae0 (HEAD, master) one
Can we make it more clear
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> So that it's possible to remove certain refs from the list without
> removing the objects that are referenced by other refs.
>
> For example this repository:
>
> * 374e8dd (crap) crap
> * 4cbbf7b (test) two
> * d025ae0 (HEAD, master
So that it's possible to remove certain refs from the list without
removing the objects that are referenced by other refs.
For example this repository:
* 374e8dd (crap) crap
* 4cbbf7b (test) two
* d025ae0 (HEAD, master) one
When using '--branches --except crap':
* 4cbbf7b (test) two
*
14 matches
Mail list logo
