Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-20 Thread Jacob Keller
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:40:22PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >> > - there are a non-trivial number of patches for other projects (JGIT, >> > EGIT, StGit, etc). This is somewhat unique to git, where we discuss >> > a

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:55:50PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: > > >> As far as

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:40:22PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > - there are a non-trivial number of patches for other projects (JGIT, > > EGIT, StGit, etc). This is somewhat unique to git, where we discuss > > a lot of related projects on the list. But I wonder if other > >

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Jacob Keller
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: >> >> As

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: > >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: > >> > >> --rfc:: > >>

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Jacob Keller
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: >> >> --rfc:: >> Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given. >> Would: Shorthand

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Jacob Keller
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jeff King wrote: > - there are a non-trivial number of patches for other projects (JGIT, > EGIT, StGit, etc). This is somewhat unique to git, where we discuss > a lot of related projects on the list. But I wonder if other > projects

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:44:08PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:49:17AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Andrew Donnellan writes: > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. Agreed

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:44:08PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:49:17AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Andrew Donnellan writes: > > > > > Sounds good to me. Agreed that "RFC" is essentially the only prefix > > > other than "PATCH" that

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:49:17AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andrew Donnellan writes: > > > Sounds good to me. Agreed that "RFC" is essentially the only prefix > > other than "PATCH" that I see, at least in the kernel. > > Around here I think we saw WIP too,

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
Andrew Donnellan writes: > Sounds good to me. Agreed that "RFC" is essentially the only prefix > other than "PATCH" that I see, at least in the kernel. Around here I think we saw WIP too, and that makes me lean towards Peff's earlier suggestion to allow an end-user

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-19 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 17/09/16 17:21, Josh Triplett wrote: This provides a shorter and more convenient alias for --subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'. Includes documentation in the format-patch manpage, and a new test covering --rfc. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett Sounds good to me. Agreed that

Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-17 Thread Jeff King
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:21:52AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > This provides a shorter and more convenient alias for > --subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'. > > Includes documentation in the format-patch manpage, and a new test > covering --rfc. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett

[PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]

2016-09-17 Thread Josh Triplett
This provides a shorter and more convenient alias for --subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'. Includes documentation in the format-patch manpage, and a new test covering --rfc. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett --- v2: - Add documentation to the format-patch manpage - Call