Re: [RFC 0/2] svn-fetch|push - an alternate approach

2012-08-21 Thread James McKaskill
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > On 08/19/2012 12:21 PM, Marco Schulze wrote: >> It is a bit of a pain to work with libsvn, but I think it is worth using >> it, not only due to protocol support, but also due to ready-to-use >> support for SVN deltas and dumps. Pipelining

Re: [RFC 0/2] svn-fetch|push - an alternate approach

2012-08-21 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 08/19/2012 12:21 PM, Marco Schulze wrote: > > On 18-08-2012 14:39, James R. McKaskill wrote: >> As a twist the code does not use the svn library, but rather talks the >> svn protocol directly. I actually found it much easier to go this route >> then trying to bend everything to how the svn libr

Re: [RFC 0/2] svn-fetch|push - an alternate approach

2012-08-19 Thread Marco Schulze
On 18-08-2012 14:39, James R. McKaskill wrote: As a twist the code does not use the svn library, but rather talks the svn protocol directly. I actually found it much easier to go this route then trying to bend everything to how the svn library understands things. It also has the advantage of not